The Bath and Body Works Witch Hand Candle Holder is a unique and enchanting accessory that adds a touch of Halloween magic to any space. With its intricate design and attention to detail, this candle holder is not only functional but also serves as a decorative piece. The main attraction of this witch hand candle holder is its spooky and eerie design. Made of high-quality resin, the holder features a realistic-looking witch's hand with long, gnarled fingers and painted black nails. The hand is carefully crafted to resemble a witch's hand, complete with wrinkles, veins, and knuckles. The attention to detail is impeccable, adding to the overall aesthetics of the piece.
The attention to detail is impeccable, adding to the overall aesthetics of the piece. The candle holder is designed to securely hold a Bath and Body Works 3-wick candle, making it the perfect addition to any Halloween-themed decor. The hand's open palm provides a stable surface for the candle, ensuring that it remains upright and stable while burning.
Jo Alyson Parker, PhD
I conduct seminar-style courses. In all courses, students can expect collaborative-learning exercises, reading responses drafting for formal papers, peer-editing workshops, and a concluding an end-of-semester self-evaluation.
My areas of interest include the eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century novel, literary theory, narrative theory, literature and science, narrative and time, and gender issues.
- Education
- B.A., University of California, Irvine, 1981
- M.A., University of California, Irvine, 1984
- Ph.D., University of California, Irvine, 1989
From 2014-18, I was the Managing Editor for KronoScope: Journal for the Study of Time. I have served on the International Society for the Study of Time Council since 2001, and I am currently the Vice-President.
- Time in Variance, The Study of Time XVII. Ed. Arkadiusz Misztal, Paul A. Harris, and Jo Alyson Parker. Leiden: Brill, 2022.
- “Out of Repetition Comes Variation”: Varying Time-Lines, Invariant Time, and Dolores’s Glitch in Westworld.” With Thomas Weissert. Time in Variance, The Study of Time XVII, co-edited with Paul A. Harris and Arkadiusz Misztal. Leiden: Brill, 2022.
- “Ted Chiang’s Braided Stories of Memory, Narrative, and Technology: ‘The Truth of Fact, the Truth of Fiction.’” Performing Memories. Media, Creation, Anthropology, and Remembrance, edited by Gabriele Biotti. Cambridge Scholars Press, 2021, 184-98.
- “Eternal Recursion, the Emergence of Metaconsciousness, and the Imperative for Closure.” With Thomas Weissert. Time’s Urgency: The Study of Time XVI, edited by Robert Daniel and Carlos Montemayor, Brill, 2019, pp. 1
- “Mind the Gap(s): Holly Sykes’s Life, the ‘Invisible’ War, and the History of the Future in The Bone Clocks.” C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-century Writings, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018, pp. 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/C21.47
- “The Chaotic Trace: Stoppard's Arcadia and the Emplotment of the Past.” Time and Trace: The Study of Time XV. Ed. Sabine Gross and Steven Ostovich. Leiden: Brill, 2016.
- “From Time’s Boomerang to Pointillist Mosaic: Translating Cloud Atlas into Film.” SubStance: A Review of Theory and Literary Criticism 44:1 (2015): 123-35.
- “A Brief History of the International Society for the Study of Time.” KronoScope: Journal for the Study of Time 13:2 (2013): 269-94.
- “Crusoe’s Foe, Foe’s Cruso, and the Origins and Future of the Novel.” KronoScope: Journal for the Study of Time 11:1 (2011): 17-40.
- Time: Limits and Constraints: The Study of Time XIII. Ed. Jo Alyson Parker, Paul Harris, and Christian Steineck. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Includes Jo Alyson Parker, “David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas of Narrative Constraints and Environmental Limits,” 201-17.
- Narrative Form and Chaos Theory in Sterne, Proust, Woolf, and Faulkner. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
- Time and Memory: The Study of Time XII. Ed. Jo Alyson Parker, Michael Crawford, and Paul Harris. Leiden: Brill, 2006. Includes “Preface to Section 1: Inscribing and Forgetting.”
- “Teaching Emma’s Narratives and the Narrative of Emma.” In Approaches to Teaching Jane Austen’s Emma. Ed. Marcia Folsom. New York: Modern Language Association, 2004. 141-50.
- “The Indeterminate Temporality of Hypertext.” In Time and Uncertainty: The Study of Time XI. Ed. Paul A. Harris and Michael Crawford. Leiden: Brill, 2004. 39-57.
- “Remembering the Future: Memento, the Reverse Arrow of Time, and the Defects of Memory.” KronoScope: Journal for the Study of Time 4:2 (2004): 239-57.
- “‘The Clockmaker’s Outcry’: Tristram Shandy and the Complexification of Time.” In Disrupted Patterns: On Chaos and Order in the Enlightenment. Ed. Theodore E.D. Braun and John McCarthy. Amsterdam-Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, 2000. 147-60.
- The Author’s Inheritance: Henry Fielding, Jane Austen, and the Establishment of the Novel. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1998.
- “Complicating a Simple Story: Inchbald’s Two Versions of Female Power,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 30 (1997): 255-70.
- “Spiraling Down ‘the Gutter of Time’: Tristram Shandy and the Strange Attractor of Death.” Weber Studies 14 (1997): 102-14.
- “Strange Attractors in Absalom, Absalom!" in Reading Matters: Narrative in the New Media Ecology. Ed. Joseph Tabbi and Michael Wutz. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997. 99-118.
- “Gendering the Robot: Stanislaw Lem’s ‘The Mask,’” Science-Fiction Studies 19 (1992): 178-91
- “Pride and Prejudice: Jane Austen’s Double Inheritance Plot,” REAL: The Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature 7 (1990): 159-190.
- Michael J. Morris Grant for Scholarly Research (2018-19)
- Lindback Award for Distinguished Teaching (2004)
- Sabbatical Research Grants (2019, 2012-13, 2000)
- Summer Research Grants (2016, 2010, 2003, 1996, 1993).
- Curriculum Development Grant (2011)
- Faculty Merit Teaching Awards (2005, 2004, 1995)
- Faculty Merit Research Award (1998)
I conduct seminar-style courses. In all courses, students can expect collaborative-learning exercises, reading responses drafting for formal papers, peer-editing workshops, and a concluding an end-of-semester self-evaluation.
The candlelight flickers through the spaces between the fingers, creating a hauntingly beautiful ambiance. In addition to its functional purpose, the Bath and Body Works Witch Hand Candle Holder also serves as a decorative piece on its own. Whether placed on a mantle, coffee table, or shelf, this candle holder instantly adds a touch of Halloween spirit to any room. Its unique and eye-catching design makes it a conversation starter and an excellent focal point. Overall, the Bath and Body Works Witch Hand Candle Holder is a must-have for anyone looking to add a touch of spookiness to their Halloween decor. Its intricate design, attention to detail, and functionality make it an excellent accessory to enhance the ambiance of any space. Whether used during the Halloween season or as a year-round decor piece, this candle holder is sure to impress both guests and residents alike..
Reviews for "The Bath and Body Works witch hand candle holder: a haunted house essential"
1. Sarah - 1/5 stars - I was really disappointed with the Bath and Body Works Witch Hand Candle Holder. First of all, it looked much smaller in person than it did online. The quality of the materials used also felt cheap and flimsy. The candle holder didn't come with any instructions, so I had to figure out how to set it up myself, and even then, it was difficult to get the candle to stay in place. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this product as it did not meet my expectations in terms of size, quality, and usability.
2. John - 2/5 stars - I was excited to purchase the Bath and Body Works Witch Hand Candle Holder, but unfortunately, it didn't live up to my expectations. The design of the hand looked cool, but the construction felt poorly made. It didn't securely hold the candle, and it felt like it could topple over easily. Additionally, the paint was already chipping off after just a couple of uses. I was hoping for a more durable and well-crafted candle holder, but this one fell short.
3. Anna - 3/5 stars - The Bath and Body Works Witch Hand Candle Holder was just okay for me. It had a unique and fun design, which is what initially attracted me to it. However, the quality wasn't great. The hand felt lightweight and fragile, and it didn't hold the candle very securely. The paint job also seemed a bit sloppy, with some areas appearing blotchy and uneven. I think this candle holder could be improved with better materials and attention to detail.