Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray is a popular beauty product known for its ability to set and prolong the wear of makeup. This setting spray is formulated with a unique blend of ingredients that help to control oil and prevent shine, giving the skin a matte and polished finish. One of the key features of Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray is its long-lasting formula. Once applied, this setting spray forms a protective barrier over the makeup, preventing it from smudging or fading throughout the day. This is especially beneficial for those with oily skin, as the setting spray helps to combat excess oil production and keep the makeup in place. The lightweight and non-greasy texture of Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray make it easy to apply and blend into the skin.
Imagined several centuries after the Vikings. In Grettir Ásmundarson there’s an old witch who carves runes onto a tree stump and uses it (it’s a long story) to kill a villain hiding out on an island. In the Sigrdrifumál, we catch allusions to things like victory runes (you scratched them onto your sword), helping runes (for things like childbirth), and speech runes (to assist in court cases).
There are quite a few of these and they’re the closest we come – long, long after the Viking period. Remember, to runes as magic. We don’t have any idea how any of it worked or how well known it was.
Being intrinsically meaningful symbols that could be read and understood by at least some nonhuman beings, they could facilitate communication between humankind and the invisible powers who animate the visible world, providing the basis for a plethora of magical acts. Most modern linguists take it for granted that the relationship between the signified the concrete reality referred to by a word and the signifier the sounds used to vocalize that word is arbitrary.
The lightweight and non-greasy texture of Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray make it easy to apply and blend into the skin. It dries quickly, leaving no sticky residue behind, and does not interfere with the application of other makeup products. This makes it a versatile option that can be used in conjunction with a wide range of makeup looks and finishes.
Runic Philosophy and Magic
This page is the third part of a five-part article on the runes. The other four parts are:
In the pre-Christian Germanic worldview, the spoken word possesses frightfully strong creative powers. As Scandinavian scholar Catharina Raudvere notes, “The pronouncement of words was recognized to have a tremendous influence over the concerns of life. The impact of a sentence uttered aloud could not be questioned and could never be taken back – as if it had become somehow physical. … Words create reality, not the other way around.” [20] This is, in an important sense, an anticipation of the philosophy of language advanced by the twentieth-century German philosopher Martin Heidegger in his seminal essay Language. For Heidegger, language is an inescapable structuring element of perception. Words don’t merely reflect our perception of the world; rather, we perceive and experience the world in the particular ways that our language demands of us. Thinking outside of language is literally unthinkable, because all thought takes place within language – hence the inherent, godlike creative powers of words. [21] In traditional Germanic society, to vocalize a thought is to make that thought part of the fabric of reality, altering reality accordingly – perhaps not absolutely, but in some important measure. [22]
Each of the runes represents a phoneme – the smallest unit of sound in a language, such as “t,” “s,” “r,” etc. – and as such is a transposition of a phoneme into a visual form.
Most modern linguists take it for granted that the relationship between the signified (the concrete reality referred to by a word) and the signifier (the sounds used to vocalize that word) is arbitrary. [23][24][25] However, a minority of linguists embrace an opposing theory known as “phonosemantics:” the idea that there is, in fact, a meaningful connection between the sounds that make up a word and the word’s meaning. To put this another way, the phoneme itself carries an inherent meaning. The meaning of the word “thorn,” for example, derives in large part from the combined meaning of the phonemes “th,” “o,” “r,” and “n.”
The phonosemantic view of language is in agreement with the traditional northern European view, where “words create reality, not the other way around.” The runes, as transpositions of phonemes, bring the inherent creative powers of speech into a visual medium. We’ve already noted that the word “rune” means “letter” only secondarily, and that its primary meaning is “secret” or “mystery” – the mysterious power carried by the phoneme itself. We must also remember the ordeal Odin undertook in order to discover the runes – no one would hang from a tree without food or water for nine days and nights, ritually wounded by his own spear, in order to obtain a set of arbitrary signifiers.
With the runes, the phonosemantic perspective takes on an additional layer of significance. Not only is the relationship between the definition of a word and the phonemes that comprise it inherently meaningful – the relationship between a phoneme and its graphic representation is inherently meaningful as well.
Thus, the runes were not only a means of fostering communication between two or more humans. Being intrinsically meaningful symbols that could be read and understood by at least some nonhuman beings, they could facilitate communication between humankind and the invisible powers who animate the visible world, providing the basis for a plethora of magical acts.
In the verses from the Völuspá quoted above, we see that the carving of runes is one of the primary means by which the Norns establish the fate of all beings (the other most often-noted method being weaving). Given that the ability to alter the course of fate is one of the central concerns of traditional Germanic magic, it should come as no surprise that the runes, as an extremely potent means of redirecting fate, and as inherently meaningful symbols, were thereby inherently magical by their very nature. This is a controversial statement to make nowadays, since some scholars insist that, while the runes may have sometimes been used for magical purposes, they were not, in and of themselves, magical.
But consider the following episode from Egil’s Saga. While traveling, Egil eats a meal with a farmer whose house is on the Viking’s route. The farmer’s daughter is dangerously ill, and he asks Egil for help. When Egil examines the girl’s bed, he finds a whalebone with runes carved on it. The farmer explains to Egil that these runes were carved by the son of a local farmer – presumably an ignorant, illiterate person whose knowledge of the runes could have only been flimsy at best. Egil, being a master of runic lore, readily discerns that this inscription is the cause of the girl’s woes. After destroying the inscription by scraping the runes off into the fire and burning the whalebone itself (!), Egil carves a different message in different runes so as to counteract the malignancy of the earlier writing. After this has been accomplished, the girl recovers. [26]
We can see from this incident that the heathen northern Europeans made a sharp distinction between the powers of the runes themselves, and the uses to which they were put. While the body of surviving runic inscriptions and literary descriptions of their use definitely suggest that the runes were sometimes put to profane, silly, and/or ignorant purposes, [27] the Eddas and sagas make it abundantly clear that the signs themselves do possess immanent magical attributes that work in particular ways regardless of the intended uses to which they’re put by humans.
References:
[20] Raudvere, Catharina. 2002. Trolldómr in Early Medieval Scandinavia. In Witchcraft and Magic in Europe, Volume 3: The Middle Ages. Edited by Bengt Ankarloo and Stuart Clark. p. 91.
[21] Heidegger, Martin. 1971. Language. In Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by Albert Hofstadter.
[22] For a cogent discussion of the role of the spoken word in the Norse creation narrative itself, see:
Kure, Henning. 2003. In the Beginning Was the Scream: Conceptual Thought in the Old Norse Myth of Creation. In Scandinavia and Christian Europe in the Middle Ages: Papers of the 12th International Saga Conference. Edited by Rudolf Simek and Judith Meurer. p. 311-319.
[23] de Saussure, Ferdinand. 2002. Writings in General Linguistics. Translated by Simon Bouquet. p. 68.
[24] Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. p. 8.
[25] Trager, George. 1949. The Field of Linguistics. p. 5.
[26] Egils saga Skalla-Grímssonar 75.
[27] MacLeod, Mindy, and Bernard Mees. 2006. Runic Amulets and Magic Objects.
In addition to its setting properties, Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray also offers added skincare benefits. The formula is infused with a variety of nourishing and hydrating ingredients, such as aloe vera and cucumber extracts. These ingredients help to soothe and calm the skin, reducing redness and inflammation that may be caused by makeup application. Overall, Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray is a reliable and effective product for achieving a long-lasting and matte finish to your makeup. Whether you're going for a natural everyday look or a more glamorous and intense makeup look, this setting spray is a great addition to your beauty routine. With its affordable price point and high-quality formula, it's no wonder that Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray is a favorite among makeup enthusiasts worldwide..
Reviews for "Why Makeup Artists Swear by Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray"
1. Emily - ★☆☆☆☆
I was really disappointed with the Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray. It claims to keep your makeup matte and set all day, but it did neither of those things for me. Within an hour of applying it, my face was already starting to look oily, and my makeup was practically sliding off. Not only that, but the spray itself was really uneven and just ended up soaking certain areas of my face. I definitely won't be repurchasing this product.
2. Jason - ★★☆☆☆
I had high hopes for the Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray, but unfortunately, it didn't live up to my expectations. While it did help keep my makeup in place for a few hours, it didn't control oil as well as I had hoped. I still ended up with a shiny forehead and nose, which defeats the purpose of a matte setting spray. The mist was also quite strong, and I found it difficult to control the amount of product that was being sprayed. Overall, I wasn't impressed with this setting spray and will be looking for alternatives.
3. Sarah - ★★☆☆☆
I wanted to love the Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray, but it just didn't work well for me. It didn't do much to extend the longevity of my makeup, and I noticed that my foundation started to break up and crease after only a few hours of wear. Additionally, the scent of the spray was overpowering and lingered throughout the day. I also found the nozzle to be quite stiff, making it hard to distribute the product evenly. Unfortunately, this setting spray didn't meet my expectations and I won't be recommending it to others.
4. Alex - ★☆☆☆☆
I experienced nothing but disappointment with the Elf Matte Magic Setting Spray. Not only did it fail to keep my makeup matte, but it also made my skin feel tight and uncomfortable. Within a couple of hours, my face looked just as oily as without the setting spray. The mist was also quite heavy and left my face feeling sticky. I tried so hard to make this product work for me, but nothing I did seemed to help. I would definitely advise others to skip this setting spray and opt for something more effective.