A Halloween witch stakes figurine is a decorative item typically used during the Halloween season. It is designed to resemble a witch and is often placed outdoors, particularly in gardens or front yards, to create a spooky and festive atmosphere. The figurine usually consists of a stake or rod that is inserted into the ground, allowing the witch to stand upright. The witch is typically made of weather-resistant materials such as resin or plastic, ensuring that it can withstand outdoor conditions. It is often painted in vivid colors and adorned with various details such as a pointed hat, broomstick, and a cauldron. Halloween witch stakes figurines come in various sizes and designs, allowing people to choose the one that suits their personal preferences and the overall aesthetic they want to achieve.
First Things depends on its subscribers and supporters. Join the conversation and make a contribution today.
It is ironic that this idea, devised by a feminist historian, often eclipses the reality that the accusation of witchcraft was a misogynistic construct weaponized against innocent women. Her impressive achievements in advancing knowledge of ancient Egypt and higher education for women have, however, been largely overshadowed by her decision to take a detour into writing about European witchcraft.
Halloween witch stakes figurines come in various sizes and designs, allowing people to choose the one that suits their personal preferences and the overall aesthetic they want to achieve. Some figurines may feature a traditional witch with a green face, crooked nose, and long black attire, while others may be more whimsical or modern in their design. These figurines are often used as part of a larger Halloween display, along with other decorations such as pumpkins, ghosts, and skeletons.
The Woman Who Inspired Wicca
J ust under a century ago, in 1921, one of the strangest books ever to be published by Oxford University Press appeared in print: The Witch-Cult in Western Europe by Margaret Alice Murray. By today’s academic standards—in fact, even by the standards of the 1920s—Murray’s book was filled with transparent flaws in methodology and research. Furthermore, the book’s author (a leading Egyptologist) was not qualified to write it. The few scholars then working on the history of European witchcraft dismissed Murray’s contribution. Yet in spite of this, The Witch-Cult in Western Europe became an instant hit and captured the imaginations of readers. Within three decades, the book had not only profoundly influenced cultural understandings of witchcraft, but also directly led to the rise of neopaganism and the foundation of a new religion, Wicca, that today has millions of adherents throughout the world.
Margaret Alice Murray (1863–1963) was born and brought up in British India—an upbringing that, as with so many Anglo-Indians of the nineteenth century, may have opened her mind to interests beyond Victorian culture. Determined to pursue a career of her own at a time when opportunities for women were limited, Murray tried out both nursing and social work before entering the progressive University College London in 1894, where she studied Egyptology under W. Flinders Petrie. Murray rapidly rose through the academic ranks, and by 1914, she was effectively running the Egyptology department. Her impressive achievements in advancing knowledge of ancient Egypt and higher education for women have, however, been largely overshadowed by her decision to take a detour into writing about European witchcraft.
In The Witch-Cult in Western Europe, Murray seized on some unusual testimonies in 16th-century Scottish witch trials to elaborate a radical theory: She claimed that what medieval and early modern people called witchcraft was, in fact, the last traces of a pagan fertility cult that originated in the Neolithic period. The witch trials of the 15th–17th centuries represented Christianity’s last attempt to stamp out this cult, which was practiced in secret covens (groups of thirteen people) who worshipped a horned god (who was mistaken for the devil). Knowledge of this cult was passed through families or, occasionally, to new initiates, but kept secret from the outside world.
Murray’s use of a single set of problematic sources from one country (Scotland) to argue that a previously unnoticed religion had existed since prehistory failed to meet basic historiographical and anthropological standards of research. She was given to making huge conceptual leaps on the basis of contentious interpretations of meager evidence. Using a small range of hostile trial records designed to discredit women accused of witchcraft (along with testimonies extracted under torture), Murray reconstructed what she believed were real religious practices lurking behind the demonological construct of the Witches’ Sabbath. In so doing, she brought together traditions of interpretation honed by the anthropologist Sir James Frazer (1854–1941), the author of The Golden Bough, and the French historian Jules Michelet (1798-1874). Murray followed Michelet in arguing that those accused of witchcraft were not the innocent victims of trumped-up charges, but were in fact adherents of a subversive cult; and she followed Frazer in her belief that prehistoric religious beliefs, associated with fertility, had survived into recent times.
Murray’s engaging prose style, her marshalling of apparent evidence, and her impressive academic credentials overawed her non-specialist readers and drowned out the skeptical voices of scholars far better versed in the history of witchcraft than she. Murray was lauded by the Folklore Society (she became its president in the 1950s) and, crucially, authored the Encyclopedia Britannica’s entry on “Witchcraft.” In an age when the Encyclopedia Britannica was considered a definitive reference work, Murray managed to imprint her highly eccentric view of witchcraft as a secret fertility religion on the popular imagination.
Although Murray herself never asserted that the witch-cult still existed, she never set a clear limit to its survival, either—and it was a small leap for someone to assert that the witch-cult still existed in 20th-century England. That someone was Gerald Brosseau Gardner (1884-1964), a retired tea plantation manager who, in 1951, announced to the British press that the witch-cult described by Murray still existed, and that he had been initiated into it. The religion of Wicca, whose adherents join covens and worship a goddess and a horned god, was born. Murray herself—by then a veteran scholar in her nineties—did not take issue with Gardner’s claims; her own publications had become progressively more eccentric, culminating with The Divine King in England (1954), in which she argued that every major political assassination in English history had been a ritual sacrifice orchestrated by covens of witches. In her correspondence Murray even mentioned practicing witchcraft herself, although it is unclear how seriously she took such experiments.
While Margaret Murray was by no means a founder or adherent of Wicca, the religion to which her writings gave birth, The Witch-Cult in Western Europe inspired the now global phenomenon of neopaganism. There can be no doubt that Murray had a brilliant scholarly imagination—too brilliant, perhaps, for the serious flaws in her reasoning to be seen by many. While few Wiccans and neopagans now believe literally that their religion has existed since prehistory, Murray’s legacy persists in the strange idea that witchcraft was a religion, an idea long since debunked by historians of witchcraft. It is ironic that this idea, devised by a feminist historian, often eclipses the reality that the accusation of witchcraft was a misogynistic construct weaponized against innocent women. Murray’s unsubstantiated claim that these women practiced a secret pagan religion was, ultimately, a calumny against the victims of a dark era of misogynistic violence.
Francis Young is a British historian and folklorist.
First Things depends on its subscribers and supporters. Join the conversation and make a contribution today.
Click here to make a donation.
Click here to subscribe to First Things .
Click here to make a donation.
They can be placed strategically in the yard, creating an eerie scene that is sure to catch the attention of passersby. The tradition of using witch stakes and other Halloween decorations stems from the ancient Celtic festival of Samhain, which celebrated the end of the harvest season and the beginning of winter. It was believed that during this time, the boundary between the living and the dead was blurred, and evil spirits could roam freely. The use of witch figurines and other spooky symbols was a way to ward off these spirits and protect oneself. Today, Halloween witch stakes figurines have become a popular and versatile decoration for Halloween enthusiasts. They add a touch of whimsy and mystique to any outdoor space, allowing people to express their creativity and get into the spirit of the season. Whether used as a standalone decoration or as part of a larger display, these figurines help create a festive and spooky atmosphere that is synonymous with Halloween..
Reviews for "The Power of Symbolism: The Meaning Behind Halloween Witch Stakes Figurines"
1. Alice - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with the Halloween witch stakes figurine. The quality was not what I expected for the price I paid. The figurine was poorly made and flimsy, and it started falling apart within a few days of putting it out in my garden. The colors were also faded and not as vibrant as they appeared in the picture. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this product to anyone looking for a durable and visually appealing Halloween decoration.
2. John - 1 star - The Halloween witch stakes figurine was a complete waste of money. It looked nothing like the picture and was much smaller than I had imagined. The material it was made of felt very cheap and lightweight. Even worse, the paint was already chipping off when I took it out of the packaging. I ended up returning it because it was just not worth the price I paid. Save your money and look for a better quality Halloween decoration elsewhere.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - I was excited to receive the Halloween witch stakes figurine, but it turned out to be a disappointment. The stake was not strong enough to hold the figurine upright, so it kept leaning to one side and eventually fell over. The details on the figurine were also not as impressive as I expected. It lacked the intricate features and vibrant colors that were shown in the product images. I would recommend looking for a more sturdy and visually appealing option if you're in the market for a Halloween decoration.