"Absolute Magic" is a book written by Derren Brown, a renowned magician, mentalist, and performer. In this book, Brown shares his thoughts and insights about magic and the psychology behind it. Unlike traditional magic books that solely focus on the technical aspects of tricks and illusions, "Absolute Magic" delves deeper into the psychological principles and techniques that make magic truly captivating and astonishing. Throughout the book, Brown presents his unique perspective on magic and the art of performance. He challenges traditional ideas and conventions, urging magicians to move beyond simple trickery and embrace a more profound approach to their craft. Brown's approach emphasizes the importance of connecting with the audience on a psychological level, rather than solely relying on sleight of hand or gimmicks.
Brown's approach emphasizes the importance of connecting with the audience on a psychological level, rather than solely relying on sleight of hand or gimmicks. One of the key themes explored in "Absolute Magic" is the concept of "patter" – the words, stories, and themes that magicians use to engage and captivate their audience. Brown emphasizes that effective patter should not only serve as a distraction but also create a meaningful narrative that enhances the overall experience.
Might & Magic: Clash of Heroes
If you’ve ever wondered what a “Puzzle RPG” might look like, you should play Might & Magic: Clash of Heroes, a successful blend of tactical puzzling with light RPG elements that perfectly fits on Nintendo’s mobile DS platform. Toronto-based indie developer Capybara Games, before Clash of Heroes known for their addictive mobile puzzle games, somehow managed to seize Ubisoft’s Might & Magic license to produce a highly original take on the increasingly crowded and perhaps stale handheld puzzle genre. A few years later its gameplay was rebalanced and ported to the PC, but here I’ll focus on the original DS version instead (and a Definitive Edition is coming soon for both PC and Switch!).
The essence of Clash of Heroes boils down to tactically piling up units to wear down and eventually deplete your enemy’s HP. This can be done either by stacking them horizontally, which will transform into a wall if matched three or more, or vertically, which will form a chain and start charging up to attack. Basic units take up just one space and are ready to attack after two to three turns, but don’t do a lot of damage. You’re better off linking attacks by chaining multiple attacks of the same type at the same time, or by fusing attacking units by stacking chains. Does this sound like Yoshi’s Cookie, Meteos, and countless of other handheld puzzlers? Because it does to me.
On the battlefield. Units with raised swords and a number next to them are charging up and will attack after that number of turns.
Except that Clash of Heroes somehow manages to feel very fresh: it’s completely turn-based so there’s no pressure of falling blocks (Tetris-like) or a timer that can run out (Bejeweled-like). You can take your time thinking and planning ahead—and you should—but every turn is limited to three moves (with the exception of special items which provide various benefits). Should you fortify your defenses? The enemy has a knight lined up and ready to go within three turns, but if we take that hit instead and focus on the right to pigeon-hole an attack there, we might get another attack in. If you’re lucky, you can create an L-shaped chain which is both a wall and an attacking chain.
Each unit comes in one of three colors, and colors have to be matched in order to form a chain. Then there’s elite units that take up two slots and require two units of the same color to be charged up, such as the knight and the lich in the above screenshot. These are your primary damage dealers: they’re much more potent and can also act as great blockers, but they’re trickier to activate, take longer to charge up, and appear less often on the battlefield. Even rarer are the true champions which take up four blocks of space, such as griffins, angels, death knights, and so forth. To activate those, you’ll need four same-colored units (2x2), and a lot of patience. If you do manage to get one of these babies activated—and defended for a while—they’re very likely to completely turn the tide of the battle. However, if the enemy manages to attack them before they’re charging, they’re sitting ducks, and they’ll be lost forever.
There’s no way to undo a stupid mistake, and wrong moves will punish you, but lost units can reappear by calling reinforcements at the cost of another move. The less units still standing on the battlefield, the more fresh meat will join the fray. And herein lies the biggest problem of Clash of Heroes: you don’t start with a clean slate, and reinforcements appear in a (semi-)random fashion. That means retrying a particular difficult boss fight can suddenly become a cakewalk if the right units appear at the right places: a blue spearman behind a blue knight means only one move to charge it, or even better, two or three promising units behind a griffin makes it easy to activate the time bomb that otherwise would not appear at all—or worse, with the completely wrong combination.
An introduction to the boss fight in story mode (left), and on the battlefield (right). These fights are unique and challenging!
In Clash of Heroes’ campaign mode, you roam around the world chasing a rather simplistic plot and gathering resources to spend at special shops, which can either restock your lost elite units or sell a trinket that for example might increase damage of deers by 25% . Movement is done in a grid-like fashion and its resource collecting and movement flair very faintly smells like Heroes of Might & Magic of yore. Yet I feel that Capybara—or perhaps, Ubisoft—did not put in enough effort to try and hit a home run with the Might & Magic franchise. This could just as well have been [insert generic fantasy realm here]. Sure, there are angels and demons, but in which fantasy world aren’t there any? The story feels weak and the Might & Magic subtitle feels slapped on, perhaps simply to boost sales?
But that’s not what we’re here for: it’s the challenging turn-based tactical battles that truly shine. Five different factions, each with their own unique regular, elite, and champion units, are gradually introduced as the story mode progresses, but a quick battle—either singleplayer against the AI or multiplayer using Download Play—is a great way to flex your brain muscles and kill a few minutes of time. Just be prepared to curse the randomness now and then and restart a battle. Speaking of cursing, I found the campaign mode to be particularly difficult and never managed to finish it. The boss battles can be brutal and pose more of a unique puzzle challenge that are hard to brute force. Perhaps the later PC version better balanced out these issues. It bummed me out as the optional quests in campaign mode also provide interesting alternative puzzle approaches (defeat the enemy with x moves or less, form a chain with x moves or less, …).
Left: I'm about to buy 5 Angel Champion units. Right: Victory! Units level up until lvl5.
The “RPG” part of the “Puzzle RPG” is limited to gathering three resources used to buy units and leveling up your hero (max HP & army members) and units (max attack). The story itself provides zero role-playing opportunities, although to be fair Capybara tried to spice things up with anime-like cut-scenes that are mildly entertaining. I would have liked to see an option to just unlock everything and treat this as a pure puzzler.
Even though there are ways to please the RNG gods in Clash of Heroes—for example, by buying a lot of knights, they appear more often than your other elite unit—randomness stays a big factor. Balance issues night further increase frustration; such as the relative uselessness of normal units and the overpowered champions that, once charged, are almost guaranteed wins. Still, if you can look besides these issues and treat it as a tactical “play with your cards right” game, I found Might & Magic: Clash of Heroes to be a remarkable game that stands out in an overabundance of mediocre Nintendo DS puzzle games, despite the absence of rich Might & Magic lore.
Categorized under: puzzle Might and MagicBio and Support
I'm Jefklak , a high-level Retro Gamer, and I love the sight of experience points on old and forgotten hardware. I sometimes convince others to join in on the nostalgic grind. Read more about The Codex here.
If you found this article amusing and/or helpful, you can support me via PayPal or Ko-Fi. I also like to hear your feedback via Mastodon or e-mail: say hello . Thanks!
Having not played either the original or the HD remaster, I obviously can't speak to whether Dotemu have made any substantial changes to the balancing of the AI in Clash Of Heroes here. But man alive, I'd almost argue that this is the game that should have been called Grindstone, because eking out a victory in these 15-20 minute battles is sometimes like pulling actual teeth - and it will repeatedly whomp you into next week if you don't keep pace with its story missions by completing various side scuffles and bounty contracts - all of which are just as difficult and challenging as its critical path.
By carefully crafting their patter, magicians can enhance the impact of their tricks and create a more profound and memorable experience for the audience. Moreover, "Absolute Magic" offers valuable insights into the psychology of perception, attention, and misdirection. Brown explains how magicians can exploit these cognitive processes to create an illusion of magic. He explores the concept of misdirection in detail, emphasizing the importance of redirecting the audience's attention to certain aspects while concealing the true workings of a trick. Overall, "Absolute Magic" is a thought-provoking and enlightening read for both aspiring magicians and those interested in the psychology behind magic. It challenges traditional notions of magic and encourages performers to embrace a more profound and meaningful approach to their craft. By exploring the psychological principles and techniques that underlie magic tricks, readers can gain a deeper understanding of the art of magic and enhance their own performances..
Reviews for "The Artistry of Absolute Magic: A Close Look at Derren Brown's Craft"
1. John - 1 star
I was extremely disappointed with "Absolute Magic" by Derren Brown. I had heard so many great things about this book and was eager to dive into the world of magic. However, I found the writing style to be dry and difficult to follow. The explanations of the tricks were convoluted, and I felt like I needed a background in magic to truly understand what was going on. Overall, the book did not live up to the hype for me.
2. Emily - 2 stars
While I appreciate Derren Brown's talent and the effort he put into "Absolute Magic," I found the book to be underwhelming. The tricks described were not as mind-blowing as I had anticipated, and the explanations were often confusing. Additionally, I was expecting more insights into the psychology behind magic, but instead, the book seemed more focused on the technical aspects. Overall, I felt like the book lacked depth and failed to capture my interest.
3. Michael - 2 stars
As a fan of Derren Brown's TV shows, I was excited to read "Absolute Magic." However, I found it to be a letdown. The book lacked a cohesive structure, jumping from one topic to another without much organization. The explanations of the tricks were overly complex, making it difficult to understand the methodology. I was hoping for more insights into Brown's thought process and personal experiences, but these elements were disappointingly absent. Overall, "Absolute Magic" fell short of my expectations and left me wanting more.