In the world of technology, speed is a crucial factor that determines the overall performance of a device or system. Over the years, the demand for faster and more efficient technologies has led to the development of various speed tests to evaluate the capabilities of different devices. One such test is the Black Magic Raw Speed Test. The Black Magic Raw Speed Test is designed specifically to measure the speed and performance of Black Magic cameras when shooting and recording in the Black Magic RAW format. Black Magic RAW is a compressed recording format that aims to balance file size and image quality. It offers significant advantages, such as better image quality and smaller file sizes, making it an attractive option for professional filmmakers and cinematographers.
It offers significant advantages, such as better image quality and smaller file sizes, making it an attractive option for professional filmmakers and cinematographers. This speed test focuses on determining the maximum frame rate at which a Black Magic camera can record in Black Magic RAW without dropping frames or compromising video quality. The test measures factors such as frame rate, resolution, and codec, providing detailed insights into the camera's performance under different scenarios.
Testing Out 8K Blackmagic RAW Speed Test On Fifteen CPUs
As we talked about yesterday in our post taking a look at strong Zen 2 performance in Adobe Lightroom, we mentioned that we’ve been augmenting our test suite for the next set of CPU launches. Lightroom is one (re)addition that’s being made, while Blackmagic RAW Speed Test is another. While we plan to integrate real-world DaVinci Resolve testing soon, we wanted to get something added into the next suite revision since our tests are not quite built yet.
Little did we realize, Blackmagic released BRAW Speed Test last month, and while it takes no time to run, it seems to give reasonable results, and most importantly, repeatable and scalable results. BM says that if your target resolution and compression ratio passes the 60 FPS mark, then it can be considered “ideal”. That’s even in the event your source footage is less than 60 FPS, because it’s not uncommon to double up on streams in production for side-by-side action (or picture-in-picture). In effect, if you manage to hit 90 FPS in one test, that should effectively mean you could hit up to 3x 8K/30 (although you wouldn’t have any headroom left).
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test appears to use application traces to test performance, because it’s a super small benchmark and doesn’t bundle in a single real media file. It also completes tests ridiculously fast, but despite that, repeated runs tend to give results accurate within 1 FPS across the board. There were some cases on certain CPUs where one run would vary slightly, with it primarily being seen on the Threadripper series. We feel like we’re beating a dead horse here, but threading anomalies that can occur with those chips is the easiest thing to blame.
With RAW Speed Test, the gauges up top reflect your target resolution and compression rate, but everything will be tested regardless of what’s chosen. The reason you can choose a specific test for the gauges is because that test will continually run even after the full suite is run. This is the case so that people can use their PCs as this test runs, and better understand how certain processes may detrimentally impact playback performance.
This test supports both CPUs and GPUs, but for the time-being, we’re focusing on CPU, as we ran these tests at the same time as our Adobe Lightroom ones. We’ll tackle GPU soon, and expect to introduce this benchmark also into our workstation GPU reviews. Nonetheless, let’s get to CPU performance and see how this test scales:
Whereas AMD’s Zen 2 excelled in our Adobe Lightroom test, some Intel chips regain the lead here. It seems all of that extra cache in Zen 2 might impact image manipulation tests more than video encoders, though this is just one test. Our Premiere Pro tests have also shown good gain on Zen 2 over the previous-gen, so if it’s not the cache making improvements, it’s the architectural updates in general.
In all of the AMD vs. Intel core-for-core match-ups, team blue leads the pack. The 9900K beats out the 3700X, and 8700K beats 3600X (despite being a generation older). The 3900X from AMD does spice things up, though, as it beats out the 9900K easily with its extra cores, despite costing the same (roughly $500).
3:1 compression is the most challenging of them all, but even so, on higher-end components, the performance may not change that much, indicating that you’re probably using a processor with a ton of headroom. Again, if you are using multiple 8K streams at once, you can effectively divide the framerate according to how many you implement.
We’re only reporting on 8K performance here, but we’ll likely include 4K performance as well when we tackle the full suite, or perhaps just include one of the direct screenshots from each CPU so that you can fetch the exact bit of information you’re looking for without us needing to produce some 20 graphs.
As mentioned before, we’re planning on introducing real Resolve benchmarks soon, but will be using this in the meantime, and also after we do have our official test, just as a second opinion (such as how we test with both Cinema 4D and Cinebench). More soon…
Rob Williams
Rob founded Techgage in 2005 to be an 'Advocate of the consumer', focusing on fair reviews and keeping people apprised of news in the tech world. Catering to both enthusiasts and businesses alike; from desktop gaming to professional workstations, and all the supporting software.
That's why you need a free SD card speed test tool. However, what is an SD card speed test, and how can it help you? Continue to read this article from EaseUS and get more information.
One of the key elements of this speed test is the evaluation of different camera models and their capabilities. By comparing the results of the test across multiple camera models, users can identify the strengths and weaknesses of each camera and make informed decisions based on their specific requirements and shooting conditions. Apart from the camera models, the Black Magic Raw Speed Test also considers other important factors that can impact the overall speed and performance. These include the type and speed of memory cards used, the recording settings, and any additional equipment or accessories that may affect the camera's performance. The Black Magic Raw Speed Test serves as a valuable tool for professionals in the film and television industry. It allows them to determine the best camera settings and configurations for different shooting scenarios, ensuring that they can capture high-quality footage without any compromises. Additionally, this test enables filmmakers to push the boundaries of their equipment, exploring new creative possibilities and achieving stunning visuals. Overall, the Black Magic Raw Speed Test plays a significant role in the world of high-quality video production. It provides filmmakers and cinematographers with precise and accurate data on a camera's performance, helping them to make informed decisions and achieve their creative vision..
Reviews for "Analyzing the Need for Speed: A Raw Speed Test of Black Magic"
1. Sarah - 2 stars - I was really disappointed by the "Black magic raw speed test". The video quality was not impressive at all and the colors were washed out. I expected much better from a company like Blackmagic. The performance was also really slow and laggy, making it difficult to even watch the video. Overall, it was a waste of time and I would not recommend it.
2. John - 1 star - I don't understand all the hype around the "Black magic raw speed test". The video was extremely pixelated and the image quality was terrible. I felt like I was watching a low-resolution video from the 90s. The speed test was also misleading, as it took forever to load and play the video. It was a frustrating experience and I would not recommend wasting your time on it.
3. Emily - 2 stars - The "Black magic raw speed test" was a disappointment for me. The video quality was average at best, and I expected much better from a company that specializes in video production. The speed test was also underwhelming, as it took a long time to load and play the video. Overall, it was not worth the anticipation and I would not recommend it.
4. Mike - 2 stars - I was not impressed with the "Black magic raw speed test". The video quality was subpar and the colors were dull. The speed of the test was also disappointing, as it took a significant amount of time just to load the video. It fell short of my expectations and I would not recommend it to others looking for a high-quality video experience.
5. Jessica - 1 star - The "Black magic raw speed test" was a complete letdown. The video quality was extremely poor and it seemed like the colors were completely off. The speed was also incredibly slow, making it painful to watch the video. I would not recommend wasting your time with this test as it does not live up to the expectations set by Blackmagic.