The Buss Curse Manuscript is a document that has garnered attention and speculation for many years. It is said to be a hand-written text that contains a curse which is believed to bring misfortune and even death to those who read it. The origins of the manuscript are shrouded in mystery, with no concrete evidence to support its existence or its author. According to legend, the curse was written by a sorcerer named Buss who was thought to possess supernatural powers. It is said that anyone who reads the curse will be plagued with bad luck and suffer a series of unfortunate events. Some versions of the legend even claim that death will come to those who dare to read from the manuscript.
★★★★★ "There's no good point to put the book down so you can get some sleep."
In winter of 1975, not long after being hired by Cooke, Rothman took the initiative to contact Jerry Buss about having his tennis franchise, the Los Angeles Strings, play at The Forum. WITCH Manuscript discovered May 2021, in Aldershot, United Kingdom, by local rambler, Bryan Potter, who found it buried beneath a pile of bricks in the middle of the woods.
Some versions of the legend even claim that death will come to those who dare to read from the manuscript. Due to its dark reputation, the Buss Curse Manuscript has become the subject of fascination and intrigue for many people. Some believe that it holds great power and caution against even looking at its pages, while others dismiss it as nothing more than a hoax or urban legend.
How to handle swear words in quote / transcription?
In my research, I interview practitioners/real users. One of them, a native english speaker, used a lot a swear words (basically the f-word).
Question: how to deal with curse words in content you need to quote? Since I use transcripts for a content (and not formal) analysis, I sometime 'smooth' interviewee wordings (like removing "hum", "well", "you know", and other recurring verbal tics). In some case, I could remove the f-word:
it's just super f*cking slow, and really f *cking annoyingHowever, in some cases it is less harmless, because it more deeply changes the perceived meaning:
if you don't want to do things, just don't f*cking do it oh f *ck, we'll just go back to do, as we were doingand in some other, I simply cannot change interviewee's words:
[. ] he really tried and wanted to build up, but he completely f*cked up every single part of every single thing.
Since I am not a native speaker, I don't know how "bad" would using the f-word be perceived (which is why I tried to be careful here.) In some cases, I could do a cut quote, e.g. "it's just super [. ] slow, and really [. ] annoying", but it looks like I'm not accurately depicting the wordings. I've also seen on the internet people using 'f*ck' standing for the f-word. Could this be a solution? (I personally find this solution a bit prudish.) Otherwise, could I simply quote them? Should I put a warning somewhere?
On December 21, 2012, according to the Mayan Calendar, the world was supposed to end. It didn't. But on that day, 113 mysterious manuscripts were discovered around the world, each one written in blood by an unknown author. After several dozen unexplained deaths befell the finders of said manuscripts, a decision was made to lock them up for good in a secret vault beneath the Vatican. It is said that anyone who reads the stories will die, and as such they are now referred to as 'The Cursed Manuscripts.'
There have been reports of individuals attempting to obtain the manuscript, whether out of curiosity or a desire to prove its existence. However, there is no concrete evidence to suggest that anyone has successfully obtained or read from the cursed document. The Buss Curse Manuscript remains an enigma, leaving many unanswered questions. Is it a real curse that holds the power to bring misfortune and death? Or is it simply a myth, perpetuated by those with a love for the supernatural and the mysterious? Without any concrete evidence or firsthand accounts, the truth about the Buss Curse Manuscript may never be known. As long as it remains a mysterious and elusive document, it will continue to capture the imaginations of those who are drawn to tales of curses and the supernatural..
Reviews for "The Hidden Powers of the Buss Curse Manuscript: Myth or Reality?"
1. Sara - 2 stars
The "Buss Curse Manuscript" was a complete disappointment for me. The plot was confusing and hard to follow, with disjointed scenes that made it difficult to establish a connection with the characters. The writing style was also incredibly dry and lacked any sort of depth or emotion. Overall, I found myself struggling to get through the book and was left feeling unsatisfied with the whole experience.
2. John - 1 star
I couldn't even finish reading the "Buss Curse Manuscript". The story was slow-paced and failed to capture my interest from the start. The characters were one-dimensional and lacked any real development. The dialogue felt forced and unnatural, making it hard to connect with any of them. I ended up feeling bored and underwhelmed by the whole book, and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
3. Emily - 2 stars
I found the "Buss Curse Manuscript" to be quite underwhelming. The plot was predictable, with no real surprises or twists to keep me engaged. The writing was amateurish and lacked polish, with awkward phrasing and repetitive descriptions. The characters were also forgettable and lacked depth, which made it difficult to care about their struggles. Overall, I was left feeling disappointed and wouldn't recommend this book to anyone looking for a captivating read.
4. Mark - 1 star
The "Buss Curse Manuscript" was a big letdown for me. The writing was tedious and lacked any real substance. The characters were flat and uninteresting, with no development or growth throughout the story. The pacing was slow, and I found myself constantly struggling to stay engaged. There was nothing about this book that stood out or left a lasting impression on me, and I would not recommend it to others.
5. Jessica - 2 stars
I had high hopes for the "Buss Curse Manuscript", but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The story lacked originality and felt like a generic rehashing of similar plotlines. The characters were poorly developed and lacked any real depth or complexity. The writing style was also unremarkable, with mundane descriptions and lackluster dialogue. Overall, I found this book to be forgettable and not worth the time invested in reading it.