Eva NYC Mane Magic Shampoo and Conditioner: A Game-Changer for Damaged Hair

By admin

Eva NYC Mane Magic Shampoo and Conditioner is a hair care duo that claims to rejuvenate and strengthen the hair. The shampoo and conditioner are both infused with natural ingredients like argan oil, that are believed to nourish and hydrate the hair. Using Eva NYC Mane Magic Shampoo and Conditioner is said to result in smoother, softer, and more manageable hair. The products are also said to add shine and reduce frizz, making the hair appear healthier and more lustrous. The shampoo effectively cleanses the hair, removing dirt, oil, and product buildup without stripping the hair of its natural oils. It lathers well and has a pleasant scent that leaves the hair smelling fresh and clean.


Touches of visual sophistication.

Unlike Hollywood films of the time that featured Chinese characters as mysterious, inscrutable, exotic, you-name-the-stereotype, Wong s characters are just everyday people trying to make their marriage work and please their family. The Curse of Quon Gwon never found a distributor and was almost completely forgotten when it was rediscovered during the research phase of Arthur Dong s documentary Hollywood Chinese.

The curse of quon glown

It lathers well and has a pleasant scent that leaves the hair smelling fresh and clean. The conditioner, on the other hand, deeply conditions and moisturizes the hair, providing it with the nourishment it needs. It is formulated to detangle the hair, making it easier to comb through and reducing breakage.

Century Film Project

Once upon a time, an enterprising Chinese-American businesswoman named Marion E. Wong set out to make a feature film, using friends and family members for her cast. After two advance screenings, the movie languished in her basement for fifty years before she gave it to a relative, and then it was another 39 years before it was restored and digitized in 2007. Now it is available, and serves as a document of a culture that was rarely captured on film at the time and even more rarely in charge of its own narrative when it was.

I cannot give a detailed summary of the movie, because some of it is lost, importantly including the Intertitles that would explain much of the relationships and action on the screen. The basic story is timeless enough, however, that we can follow it in broad outline: a young Chinese American girl (Violet Wong, real-life sister-in-law of the director) with Western ideas marries into a very traditional family and is driven out by her scornful in-laws. The movie opens as the groom gives a statue of a household god to his mother, who seems to lecture him about the old ways. We see a good deal of the build-up to the marriage, in which the girl and her betrothed have tea together in what will be her bedroom, and she pokes good-natured fun at some of the traditional accoutrements of the ceremony, including a pair of oddly-balanced slippers for the bride, and a dangly headpiece for the groom. We also see her efforts to get along with her future mother-in-law, who seems quite formal, but not unfriendly at this stage. There is a scene I couldn’t follow in which she speaks to her husband in an outdoor setting, and suddenly breaks down crying (I’m guessing that he’s telling her he must go away for a while, based on what happens next). Then we see what seems to be the tail end of the wedding ceremony, demonstrating that she has learned to walk in the awkward slippers.

In the next sequence, the husband is missing, but there is a new element: Now Marion Wong appears as the “villain,” evidently a sister-in-law or other relative living in the same house. She takes Violet’s baby away and the mother-in-;aw gestures for her to leave after a confrontation, offering her a knife to commit suicide. I think Violet is being accused of neglecting her baby, since what seems to be a doctor comes to look at the child in a later scene. Violet goes out into the rain and seems to be ready to slash her wrists, but suddenly throws down the knife and wanders out into the wilderness. There is an odd scene in which she cuddles a lamb, appearing no worse for the wear after sleeping outside in the rain. Then we return to the house, where the husband returns and learns what has happened. He cries for his loss and confronts Marion with her cruelty. Then Violet turns up at the door again, and her takes her in and comforts her. Marion, realizing that her plot has failed, plunges the dagger into her own heart. At the end, Violet produces the household god and pays homage to it, suggesting that all the turmoil was due to her disrespect at the beginning, and that the tragic events since then have helped her to accept traditional ways.

What’s that on your shoulder, son?

I wasn’t sure what to expect from an non-studio film from this period but I was pretty impressed, especially by the filming and editing techniques. Most beginning filmmakers, especially at this early time, don’t give themselves enough “coverage” to show a scene from multiple angles, get close-ups and establishing shots, etc., but Marion and her crew did quite well. It was, in fact, less “stagey” and static than a lot of professionally-made films at the time, and demonstrates a good grasp of so-called “film grammar” with a liberal amount of different angles and shots. Scenes sometimes end with an iris-in, especially for strong emotional moments. One particularly good shot shows Violet at her mirror, with her face perfectly framed by the mirror as she works on her complicated braids. That’s not to say there are no mistakes – one scene had a distracting reflection that kept hitting the leading man’s shoulder, and a couple of edits have a sort of “hiccup” effect where we see the last few frames before the cut were repeated. And, of course, some of the footage is less than perfectly intact, so it’s hard to know how good it was meant to be.

It’s a pity that audiences of 1916 missed out on this movie. I suspect that Ms. Wong discovered that distribution was more difficult and expensive an investment than she’d anticipated, and gave up when she realized she probably wouldn’t make her money back trying to do it independently. It remains however as a document of a truly under-represented segment of American culture from a time period that tends to look disturbingly white when only the most popular images are seen.

Alternate Title: The Curse of Quon Gwon: When the Far East Mingles with the West

Director: Marion E. Wong

Camera: Unknown

Starring: Marion E. Wong, Violet Wong, Harvey Soohoo.

Run Time: 35 Min (surviving print)

You can watch it for free: here (no music).

Once upon a time, an enterprising Chinese-American businesswoman named Marion E. Wong set out to make a feature film, using friends and family members for her cast. After two advance screenings, the movie languished in her basement for fifty years before she gave it to a relative, and then it was another 39 years before it was restored and digitized in 2007. Now it is available, and serves as a document of a culture that was rarely captured on film at the time and even more rarely in charge of its own narrative when it was.
Eva nyc mane amgic shampoo and condiitoner

The conditioner also helps to protect the hair from heat damage caused by styling tools. Eva NYC Mane Magic Shampoo and Conditioner are suitable for all hair types and can be used on a daily basis. Users have reported positive results, claiming that their hair feels noticeably softer, smoother, and healthier after using the products. Overall, Eva NYC Mane Magic Shampoo and Conditioner are popular hair care products that aim to improve the overall health and appearance of the hair. They offer a combination of cleansing, hydration, and nourishment, making them a great choice for those looking to improve the condition of their hair..

Reviews for "Eva NYC Mane Magic Shampoo and Conditioner: The Ultimate Solution for Tangled Hair"

1. Sarah - 2 out of 5 stars - I was really disappointed with the Eva nyc mane magic shampoo and conditioner. First of all, the scent was way too strong and overpowering. It gave me a headache every time I used it. Secondly, it didn't do much to improve the condition of my hair. I have dry and damaged hair, and I was hoping this product would provide some much-needed hydration, but it left my hair feeling dry and stripped. Overall, I would not recommend this shampoo and conditioner to anyone with similar hair concerns.
2. Mark - 1 out of 5 stars - I regret purchasing the Eva nyc mane magic shampoo and conditioner. Not only did it not live up to its claims of providing volume and shine, but it actually made my hair look limp and feel weighed down. The shampoo didn't lather well, and I had to use a lot of product to thoroughly clean my hair. Even after using the conditioner, my hair still felt dry and tangled. I definitely won't be repurchasing this duo and would advise others to steer clear as well.
3. Emily - 2 out of 5 stars - The Eva nyc mane magic shampoo and conditioner didn't work well for my hair type. I have fine, oily hair, and this product made it feel greasier than usual. The shampoo didn't seem to thoroughly cleanse my scalp, leaving behind residue and build-up. The conditioner was also too heavy and left my hair looking flat and lifeless. I think this product might be better suited for those with dry or damaged hair, but for me, it was a miss. I'll be sticking to my usual shampoo and conditioner from now on.

Eva NYC Mane Magic Shampoo and Conditioner vs. Other Hair Care Brands: A Comparison

Say Hello to Luscious Locks with Eva NYC Mane Magic Shampoo and Conditioner