A magic wand is a fictional item often featured in folklore, fantasy literature, and fairy tales. It is typically depicted as a long, thin rod or scepter that can be used to perform various magical abilities or spells. The concept of the magic wand has been widely popularized and is now commonly associated with witches, wizards, and other magical beings. In many stories, the magic wand is the primary tool used by wizards or witches to cast spells or perform magical acts. It is often said that the wand is a conduit for the magical energies within the user, allowing them to focus and direct their powers more effectively. By waving or pointing the wand, the user can unleash powerful enchantments, create illusions, teleport themselves or objects, or manipulate the elements, among other abilities.
For more information about United States v. Paul Wand, please see below:
Criminal Information
Plea Agreement
These applications falsely represented that Lewis,Wand, and Zager would be treating and charging CareCredit patients, when, in fact, Nobbe was the one purportedly treating and charging same patients. Overview Lewis, Nobbe, Wand, and Zager collectively, the defendants were charged for participating in a criminal conspiracy to defraud patients through CareCredit, a credit card program offered to consumers by Synchrony Bank Synchrony to finance out-of-pocket healthcare expenses.
By waving or pointing the wand, the user can unleash powerful enchantments, create illusions, teleport themselves or objects, or manipulate the elements, among other abilities. The magic wand is believed to hold great power and is often considered a symbol of authority and mastery over magic. In some stories, the wand is said to choose its rightful owner, responding only to those who possess the necessary skills and virtues to wield it responsibly.
Dynamic Medical Services (Lewis, Wand, Nobbe, Zager)
Court Assigned: These cases are assigned to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The Lewis and Wand cases are being heard in the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. The assigned judges for these cases are Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra (USA v. Wand,USA v. Nobbe and USA v. Zager), Judge Darrin P. Gayles (USA v. Lewis).
Latest Update: On March 24, 2022, defendant Mark Zager, a medical doctor practicing in Florida, was sentenced to 24 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release and $ 172,891 restitution. Zager pleaded guilty on September 27, 2021.
At this time the prosecution team is in the process of compiling a list of victim restitution claims to provide to the clerk of the court. If you wish to submit a claim and have not yet done so, please contact us no later than by sending a Victim Impact Statement to [email protected].
On March 18, 2021, defendant Stuart Lewis was sentenced to time served to be followed by three years of supervised release. Lewis pleaded guilty on November 17, 2020.
On January 28, 2021, defendant Paul Wand was sentenced to three years imprisonment to be followed by five years supervised release. Wand pleaded guilty on October 9, 2020.
Defendant Dennis Nobbe passed away on September 14, 2020. The case against Nobbe was dismissed on October 13, 2020.
Overview: Lewis, Nobbe, Wand, and Zager (collectively, “the defendants”) were charged for participating in a criminal conspiracy to defraud patients through CareCredit, a credit card program offered to consumers by Synchrony Bank (“Synchrony”) to finance out-of-pocket healthcare expenses. Nobbe provided chiropractic treatments through Dynamic Medical Services, Inc. (“DMS”), a Florida-based corporation. Unlike Lewis,Wand, and Zager, who were medical doctors, Nobbe was a chiropractic physician. Relevant court filings allege that the Defendants conspired to defraud Medicare and Synchrony Bank, a federally insured financial institution, by filing false and fraudulent claims in order to profit from patients using CareCredit. Synchrony had previously ejected Nobbe from the CareCredit program in 2010 for engaging in “risky” transactions. To circumvent this restriction, Nobbe allegedly encouraged Lewis,Wand, and Zager to submit false and fraudulent applications to Synchrony to become approved healthcare providers in the CareCredit network.
These applications falsely represented that Lewis,Wand, and Zager would be treating and charging CareCredit patients, when, in fact, Nobbe was the one purportedly treating and charging same patients. Nobbe, moreover, allegedly encouraged DMS patients to open CareCredit account but failed to inform these patients about the high interest rates associated with CareCredit charges and concealed from these patients the fact that he was not an authorized CareCredit provider. Nobbe routinely charged patients for services that purportedly would be provided in the future but that, in fact, were often not provided. Nobbe further allegedly paid kickbacks and bribes to Wand to submit claims to Medicare that falsely and fraudulently represented that they had performed certain services when, in truth and in fact, those services had been provided by Nobbe. Nobbe is also accused of conspiring to defraud the U.S. Government by submitting false and fraudulent applications to the Small Business Administration for Paycheck Protection Program loans against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic.
For more information about United States v. Stuart Lewis, please see below:
Criminal Information
Plea Agreement
For more information about United States v. Dennis Nobbe, please see below:
Press Release – July 29, 2020
Criminal Complaint
For more information about United States v. Paul Wand, please see below:
Criminal Information
Plea Agreement
For more information about United States v. Mark Zager, please see below:
Criminal Information
Plea Agreement
Victim Impact Statement: If you would like to submit a Victim Impact Statement you may do so by mailing the Victim Impact Statement below to: Victim Witness Unit, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, 10th & Constitution Avenue, NW, Bond Building, Room 4416, Washington, DC 20530. You also may submit the Victim Impact Statement via email at [email protected] or by fax at: (202) 514-3708. Please note: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic response, statements submitted by regular mail and fax may be delayed. For that reason, victims are highly encouraged to submit victim impact statements by e-mail to: [email protected].
The information on this website will be updated as new developments arise in the case. If you have any questions, please call the Victim Assistance Line toll-free at (888) 549-3945 or email us at [email protected]. Please note: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic response, the most reliable method of contacting victim-witness staff is via e-mail. If you need to speak to someone over the phone, let victim-witness staff know in your e-mail, and someone will call you as soon as practicable.
Presumption of Innocence: It is important to keep in mind that defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty and that presumption requires both the court and our office to take certain steps to ensure that justice is served.
Crime Victims’ Rights Act and Right to Retain Counsel: The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771) applies only to victims of the counts charged in federal court, and thus individuals may not be able to exercise all of these rights if the crime of which the individual is a victim was not charged. Section 3771(c)(2) of this Act requires that we advise you that you have the right to retain counsel. Although the statute specifically sets forth your right to seek advice of an attorney with regard to your rights under the statute, there is no requirement that you retain counsel. The Government may not recommend any specific counsel, nor can the Government (or the Court) pay for counsel to represent you. Government attorneys represent the United States.
If you elect to obtain counsel to represent your interests, please have your attorney notify this office in writing at: U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, 10th & Constitution Avenue, NW, Bond Building, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20530, Attention: Victim Witness Unit; fax: (202) 514-3708; or email: [email protected]. If you elect not to retain counsel to represent your interests, you do not need to do anything.
Court Assigned: These cases are assigned to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The Lewis and Wand cases are being heard in the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. The assigned judges for these cases are Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra (USA v. Wand,USA v. Nobbe and USA v. Zager), Judge Darrin P. Gayles (USA v. Lewis).
This notion adds a sense of mystique and exclusivity to the use of wands in magical practices. The lore surrounding the magic wand varies across different cultures and works of fiction. For example, in the Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling, each wand is made from a specific type of wood and contains a core of a magical substance, such as a phoenix feather or dragon heartstring. These details add depth to the mythology of wands, suggesting that they have their own unique properties that can influence the spells cast with them. Outside of literature and folklore, the concept of the magic wand has also found its way into popular culture and entertainment. Magic wands are often depicted in movies, television shows, and video games as a staple accessory for magical characters. They have become iconic symbols of fantasy and are instantly recognizable by audiences around the world. While magic wands are fictional objects, they hold a significant place in the collective imagination. They represent the limitless possibilities and wonder of magic, allowing us to dream of what could be if we had the ability to shape reality with a simple wave of a wand. Whether as a source of inspiration or a nostalgic reminder of childhood fantasies, the magic wand continues to capture our imagination and enchant us with its mystical allure..
Reviews for "Exploring the Possibilities: Creative Uses for the Magic Wand USB"
1. Jennifer - 2 out of 5 stars - I was really disappointed with the Magic Wand USB. The packaging was cheap and flimsy, and the wand itself felt like it was made of low-quality plastic. When I plugged it into my computer, it took forever to be recognized and even then, the transfer speeds were painfully slow. I had high hopes for this product, but unfortunately, it just didn't live up to my expectations.
2. Mark - 1 out of 5 stars - This Magic Wand USB was a complete waste of money. First of all, it didn't fit properly into the USB ports of my devices. I had to wiggle it around just to get it to make a connection. Second, the transfer speeds were abysmal. It took ages to transfer even small files. Lastly, after just a few uses, the wand stopped working altogether. I expected better quality for the price I paid. I would not recommend this product to anyone.
3. Amanda - 2 out of 5 stars - I bought the Magic Wand USB thinking it would be a convenient and reliable storage solution. However, I quickly realized that it was anything but. The device kept getting overheated during file transfers, leading to slow speeds and occasional data corruption. The small size was also a drawback as it was easily misplaced. Overall, I was disappointed with the performance and durability of this product and would not purchase it again.
4. John - 3 out of 5 stars - While the Magic Wand USB did get the job done, there were a few issues that bothered me. Firstly, the design was not very ergonomic. It was uncomfortable to hold for extended periods of time. Secondly, the included software was clunky and difficult to use. I also experienced some compatibility issues with certain devices. Overall, it worked, but it could definitely use some improvements in terms of design and functionality.
5. Sarah - 2 out of 5 stars - The Magic Wand USB was a letdown for me. The advertised transfer speeds were not achieved, and I found it to be slower than other USB drives I have used before. Additionally, the build quality felt cheap, and the wand was not as sturdy as I hoped. The design was also impractical, as the wand shape made it difficult to fit into tight USB ports. I would recommend looking for alternative options instead.