Injustice and Mass Hysteria: A Deep Dive into the Salem Witch Hunts

By admin

The story of the Salem witch hunts is an alarming chapter in American history that unfolded in the late 17th century. It was a time when a wave of hysteria and fear swept through the small village of Salem, Massachusetts, resulting in the execution of 20 innocent people accused of witchcraft. The events began in 1692 when a group of young girls, after experiencing strange symptoms and behavior, started accusing certain villagers of bewitching them. These accusations sparked a witch hunt that spread like wildfire. The accusations were believed without evidence or due process, leading to the arrests of numerous individuals. As the accusations grew, so did the paranoia and fear within the community.


Even Improved Invisibility, works on visual sensors; it'd work fine on cameras, even thermographic ones. I might even let it extend to a laser trip-beam.

Non permanent wards are dirt cheap to have a mage come cast every few weeks, and three seconds is more then enough for the cameras to pick you up and ring the alarm, alternatively activate the sprinklers with non-toxic dye. In terms of game balance, you re looking at layered spells cast at reasonably high Force to beat the object resistance and sustained just to defeat basic cheap security camera ultrasound sensor , so it seems fair -- you d have to be a pretty spiffy mage and or own some pretty serious gear to pull it off.

Camouflaged thread spell

As the accusations grew, so did the paranoia and fear within the community. The trials that followed were a sham, lacking any semblance of fairness or justice. The accused were subjected to harsh interrogations and tests, such as the infamous swimming test, where a person suspected of being a witch was thrown into water.

Camouflaged thread spell


Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 21-December 12
From: Langley, BC
Member No.: 66,061

Hi there! I am a long time GM of RPGs in general, recently looked into Shadowrun and I am running a 4th edition game for some local friends, and its been a blast, however one of my players has this spell Camouflage (and the better version of it as well) and literally consistently gives anyone a -6 at least to be able to perceive him.

How do I go about getting around it for the bad guys? Now not every bad guy is going to be able to see through it, but so far as he described and as I read it, it seems pretty powerful. I will note that I have read and reread recently and noted that it affects "visual" perception based checks/tests, does this mean something like Ultrasound sensors will see him and allow the wearer to see a humanoid sound based shape where the PC is standing?

What are some other ways to see Invisibility and Camouflage and the Physical Camouflage spells?

Jan 28 2013, 01:55 PM Post #2


Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818

Thermographics shouldn't give a toss about what color someone is. Other nonstandard wavelengths might work too - UV, for example, should be worth at least, oh . halving the modifier for Camoflage.

Ultrasound doesn't give a toss even about invisibility - it's not VISUAL; it's a processor interpreting artificial echolocation into a visual output.

Tymeaus Jalynsfein Jan 28 2013, 03:34 PM Post #3

Prime Runner Ascendant


Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022

UWB (Ultra Wide-Band Radar) also does not give a squat about the Camoflauge spell (Or invisibility, for that matter).

Jan 28 2013, 08:14 PM Post #4


Group: Members
Posts: 2,654
Joined: 29-October 06
Member No.: 9,731

Ultrasound and UWB radar sensors are cheap enough that basically every facility with pretensions toward security should have them. Invisibility and related spells shouldn't be useless, but neither should they be the be-all and end-all of infiltration.

Jan 28 2013, 08:23 PM Post #5


Group: Banned
Posts: 1,584
Joined: 2-March 11
Member No.: 23,135

IIRC, there are 'improved' variants to foil technological sensors.

Something that can astrally perceive will do the trick.

Jan 28 2013, 08:40 PM Post #6


Group: Members
Posts: 1,930
Joined: 9-April 05
From: Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 7,310

I feel like a broken record, but.
Wards! anyone want wards? got some fine wards here!
Wards tend to mess up sustained spells (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Jan 28 2013, 08:46 PM Post #7


Group: Members
Posts: 2,575
Joined: 5-February 10
Member No.: 18,115

Yep, astral perception should pick up the glaring aura of the spell and its target no problem.

Far easier, though, is just to use non-visual methods of detection. Simple things, even. A guard dog will be able to smell an intruder, visible or no. Pressure plates in the floor will register their weight. Laser tripwires will trigger when broken. Any sounds they make will be fully audible, and any objects they interact with will be fully visible. Something as simple as an unlocked door that they have to open and close again in the presence of an onlooker can give them away. And in a crowded area, other people can bump into them.

Addendum: @Lionhearted Not every location can afford to pay mages the regular costs of wards. Also, all the ward does is require them to drop the spell and recast it on the other side.

Jan 28 2013, 08:49 PM Post #8


Group: Members
Posts: 2,351
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance
Member No.: 17,653

Wards can work as long as the magician can't pretend to be the magician that erected it.

There was also a thread some time back that had evolved into a discussion about trying to tie sensors directly to vision wear as a real-time way to try and circumvent something like an Invisibility spell. Looking through a camera sensor certainly will work, since Invisibility and Camouflage are mind affecting only spells. For Improved Invisibility and Physical Camouflage, pretty much what was already said above (ultrasound, various radars, motion sensors, dual natured critters, astrally perceiving the area, etc.).

Jan 28 2013, 08:53 PM Post #9


Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818

QUOTE (Epicedion @ Jan 28 2013, 03:23 PM) IIRC, there are 'improved' variants to foil technological sensors.

Even Improved Invisibility, works on visual sensors; it'd work fine on cameras, even thermographic ones. I might even let it extend to a laser trip-beam.

But an ultrasound scanner, or an infrasound trip-beam? Sorry no, those don't work by "sight", biological or technological. No invisibility, nor color-change, spell is going to work against those.

Jan 28 2013, 09:16 PM Post #10


Group: Members
Posts: 1,930
Joined: 9-April 05
From: Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 7,310

QUOTE (Umidori @ Jan 28 2013, 09:46 PM)

Addendum: @Lionhearted Not every location can afford to pay mages the regular costs of wards. Also, all the ward does is require them to drop the spell and recast it on the other side.


Non permanent wards are dirt cheap to have a mage come cast every few weeks, and three seconds is more then enough for the cameras to pick you up and ring the alarm, alternatively activate the sprinklers with non-toxic dye.
Sure you won't find it at Joe Schmoes bar but anything worth enough to have physical security around. For sure.

Jan 28 2013, 09:36 PM Post #11


Group: Banned
Posts: 1,584
Joined: 2-March 11
Member No.: 23,135

QUOTE (_Pax._ @ Jan 28 2013, 03:53 PM)

Even Improved Invisibility, works on visual sensors; it'd work fine on cameras, even thermographic ones. I might even let it extend to a laser trip-beam.

But an ultrasound scanner, or an infrasound trip-beam? Sorry no, those don't work by "sight", biological or technological. No invisibility, nor color-change, spell is going to work against those.

That's what Silence is for.

Jan 28 2013, 09:41 PM Post #12


Group: Members
Posts: 2,654
Joined: 29-October 06
Member No.: 9,731

QUOTE (Epicedion @ Jan 28 2013, 04:36 PM) That's what Silence is for.
Creating a gaping void in the sensor return, which is just as much of a giveaway. Jan 28 2013, 09:58 PM Post #13


Group: Banned
Posts: 1,584
Joined: 2-March 11
Member No.: 23,135

QUOTE (Tanegar @ Jan 28 2013, 04:41 PM) Creating a gaping void in the sensor return, which is just as much of a giveaway.

I would expect that's heavily dependent on how sophisticated the sensor actually is. Ultrasound isn't a particularly error-free or high-resolution thing. Depending on how you want to play it, an ultrasound sensor could easily interpolate a small dead area as bad data, especially if it doesn't stick around very long. Now, someone watching the associated image on a screen might be able to spot the target as a "shadow" on the display pretty easily. A silence spell engulfing the sensor itself would effectively render it useless (so if you target the guy with ultrasound goggles with Silence he won't see anything at all -- no ceiling, floor, walls, nothing, probably making it very disorienting.

Jan 28 2013, 10:06 PM Post #14


Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818

QUOTE (Epicedion @ Jan 28 2013, 04:58 PM)

I would expect that's heavily dependent on how sophisticated the sensor actually is. Ultrasound isn't a particularly error-free or high-resolution thing.

Cheap $10 2013 motion detectors would light up like a christmas tree, if an "infinite hole" suddenly entered their field of view.

I can't imagine 2070's sensors are any less capable.

QUOTE A silence spell engulfing the sensor itself would effectively render it useless

That's . not actually how motion detectors work.

A motion detector, a.k.a. ultrasound sensor, works by constantly mapping and remapping the entire world within their range and field of view. Any change over a relatively small amount - 3% to 6%, say - triggers the alarm.

A silence spell engulfing the sensor would be a 100% change.

Think about that.

Jan 28 2013, 10:09 PM Post #15


Group: Members
Posts: 1,930
Joined: 9-April 05
From: Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 7,310

Would an improved invisible target break a laser trip beam? Jan 28 2013, 10:17 PM Post #16


Group: Members
Posts: 651
Joined: 20-July 12
From: Arizona
Member No.: 53,066

if you're running Invis+Silence unless you happen to have some REALLY good Foci, you're at some pretty small dice to do much of anything.

Jan 28 2013, 10:25 PM Post #17


Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626

QUOTE (_Pax._ @ Jan 28 2013, 02:06 PM)

Cheap $10 2013 motion detectors would light up like a christmas tree, if an "infinite hole" suddenly entered their field of view.

I can't imagine 2070's sensors are any less capable.

That's . not actually how motion detectors work.

A motion detector, a.k.a. ultrasound sensor, works by constantly mapping and remapping the entire world within their range and field of view. Any change over a relatively small amount - 3% to 6%, say - triggers the alarm.

A silence spell engulfing the sensor would be a 100% change.

Think about that.

To be fair, it could also look like a hardware failure when suddenly your sensor goes apeshit but isn't actually showing anything.

Jan 28 2013, 10:26 PM Post #18


Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626

QUOTE (Lionhearted @ Jan 28 2013, 02:09 PM) Would an improved invisible target break a laser trip beam?

No, improved invisibility works by warping light rather than tricking a mind into not detecting it. So the laser would never trip but merely be re-directed around for a moment.

Tymeaus Jalynsfein Jan 28 2013, 10:46 PM Post #19

Prime Runner Ascendant


Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022

QUOTE (Lionhearted @ Jan 28 2013, 03:09 PM) Would an improved invisible target break a laser trip beam?

Would it crack the Twig that was stepped upon?

Jan 28 2013, 10:51 PM Post #20


Group: Members
Posts: 1,930
Joined: 9-April 05
From: Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 7,310

QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jan 28 2013, 11:46 PM) Would it crack the Twig that was stepped upon?
Twigs are not light beams TJ, what is sight if not light reflected off a surface? Jan 28 2013, 10:52 PM Post #21


Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626

QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jan 28 2013, 02:46 PM) Would it crack the Twig that was stepped upon?

Of course it would, TJ. You're talking about stepping on a physical object versus stepping through a beam of light. Apples to oranges really.

Tymeaus Jalynsfein Jan 28 2013, 11:11 PM Post #22

Prime Runner Ascendant


Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022

*shrug* Jan 29 2013, 02:07 AM Post #23


Group: Banned
Posts: 1,584
Joined: 2-March 11
Member No.: 23,135

QUOTE (_Pax._ @ Jan 28 2013, 05:06 PM)

Cheap $10 2013 motion detectors would light up like a christmas tree, if an "infinite hole" suddenly entered their field of view.

I can't imagine 2070's sensors are any less capable.

That's . not actually how motion detectors work.

A motion detector, a.k.a. ultrasound sensor, works by constantly mapping and remapping the entire world within their range and field of view. Any change over a relatively small amount - 3% to 6%, say - triggers the alarm.

A silence spell engulfing the sensor would be a 100% change.

Think about that.

More to the point, the Silence spell description says that it's useful for jamming technological sensors: detection devices, sonar, etc. I suppose it depends on how you want to read "useful" and "jamming" but in general I'd say that to GM such a situation, it's probably better to let magic foil unattended devices and provide complications for attended devices, rather than go into the physics of exactly what the spell is doing and how that physically affects the sensors. Magic gets to be weird on occasion.

In terms of game balance, you're looking at layered spells cast at reasonably high Force (to beat the object resistance) and sustained just to defeat basic cheap security (camera + ultrasound sensor), so it seems fair -- you'd have to be a pretty spiffy mage and/or own some pretty serious gear to pull it off. In a contested environment, a silence spell might look like a hole in the visual field of someone viewing through an ultrasound device (or a sufficiently advanced piece of equipment, like a drone, with a Pilot program), which could be enough to prompt Blind Fire at the target if the operator is sufficiently trained to recognize it (if you see big void in your readout, don't ask questions, just shoot at the middle).

In other words, having a cheap piece of tech be the be-all/end-all of intrusion detection is kind of lame.

if you're running Invis+Silence unless you happen to have some REALLY good Foci, you're at some pretty small dice to do much of anything.
Story of the salem witch hunts book

If they floated, it was believed they were a witch; if they sank, it was deemed they were innocent. The Salem witch hunts book reveals the impact of religious extremism and Puritan beliefs on the events. The strict religious practices of the Puritan community, combined with their deep-rooted fear of the Devil, created a fertile ground for the hysteria to take hold. The book also highlights the role of social hierarchy and communal tensions in fueling the accusations. One of the most tragic aspects of the Salem witch hunts was the fact that the accused were mainly women who did not conform to the traditional expectations of society. Many were poor, elderly, outspoken, or seen as social outcasts. The accusations were a means to control these individuals and maintain the social order. The Salem witch hunts book sheds light on the tragic consequences of mass hysteria and the dangers of a justice system driven by fear and prejudice. It serves as a reminder of the importance of due process and the dangers of unchecked power. The story of the Salem witch hunts continues to captivate and haunt us, serving as a cautionary tale of how fear and intolerance can lead to grave injustices..

Reviews for "The Psychology of Hysteria: Understanding the Minds of the Accusers in Salem"

- John - 1 star - I found "Story of the Salem Witch Hunts" to be extremely dull and unengaging. The writing style was dry and lacking in any emotion or excitement. The author failed to bring the characters and events to life, making it difficult to stay interested in the story. Additionally, the book seemed to be more of a historical account rather than a captivating narrative. Overall, I was very disappointed and would not recommend this book to others.
- Mary - 2 stars - "Story of the Salem Witch Hunts" had so much potential, but it ultimately fell flat for me. The author did a good job at researching the history and presenting the facts, but the storytelling aspect was lacking. The narrative was disjointed and I struggled to follow the timeline of events. Moreover, the characters felt one-dimensional and I couldn't connect with any of them. I appreciate the effort put into the book, but it didn't meet my expectations.
- Robert - 2 stars - I was excited to read "Story of the Salem Witch Hunts" as I have always been interested in this period of history. However, I found the book to be overly long and repetitive. The author seemed to get caught up in trivial details, dragging out the story unnecessarily. It felt like I was reading a textbook rather than an engaging narrative. Additionally, the writing style was dry and lacked any sort of flair or creativity. Overall, I was disappointed with this book and would not recommend it to others.

A Tale of Fear and Manipulation: The Story of the Salem Witch Hunts

Witchcraft and Women's History: Unearthing the Stories of Salem's Accused