During the infamous witchcraft trials in colonial America, one of the defendants was Sarah Good. These trials took place in the early 1690s in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, specifically in the town of Salem. Sarah Good was accused of practicing witchcraft and faced a trial that would ultimately decide her fate. Sarah Good was a poor, outcast woman who had a reputation for being eccentric and different from the rest of the community. This made her an easy target for those looking for someone to blame for the strange occurrences happening in Salem. The trials themselves were fueled by paranoia and fear, with many people accusing their neighbors and even family members of being witches.
"We make no charge for glass balls," said the shopman politely. "We get them,"--he picked one out of his elbow as he spoke--"free." He produced another from the back of his neck, and laid it beside its predecessor on the counter. Gip regarded his glass ball sagely, then directed a look of inquiry at the two on the counter, and finally brought his round-eyed scrutiny to the shopman, who smiled.
Gip regarded his glass ball sagely, then directed a look of inquiry at the two on the counter, and finally brought his round-eyed scrutiny to the shopman, who smiled. I had fancied it was down nearer the Circus, or round the corner in Oxford Street, or even in Holborn; always over the way and a little inaccessible it had been, with something of the mirage in its position; but here it was now quite indisputably, and the fat end of Gip s pointing finger made a noise upon the glass.
The trials themselves were fueled by paranoia and fear, with many people accusing their neighbors and even family members of being witches. Throughout her trial, Sarah Good maintained her innocence, proclaiming that she was not a witch and denying any involvement in the accused acts of witchcraft. However, her claims fell on deaf ears as the court was determined to make an example of those accused of witchcraft.
The magi shop ig wells
See top menu for all 850+ stories
Approximate Reading Times
Quick Read: under 5 minutes
Short Story: 5 to 30 minutes
Novelette: 30 to 90 minutes
Novella: 1.5 to 2.5 hours
There Was Once
Quick Read by Margaret Atwood. A storyteller is humiliated into whittling his twenty-four-word opening sentence down to just one, and then changing it. This humorous vignette mocks our modern-day obsession with political correctness by illustrating how, taken to extremes, almost anything one says has the potential to offend someone.
Guests of the Nation
Short Story by Frank O’Connor. Set during, or possibly shortly after, the Irish War of Independence of 1919-1921, two young Irishmen become friends with two English ‘prisoners’ they are guarding. That is until a cold-hearted officer orders them to take part in the execution of the two men.
Little Red Riding Hood
French & German Folktales. Two versions of the well-known children’s story: the Charles Perrault “Mother Goose” version, and the Brother’s Grimm’s “Little Red Cap”. In both stories, Red is punished for talking to strangers (the wolf) by being “eaten”. The Brothers let her survive to soften the ending for children.
The Answer is No
Short Story by Naguib Mahfouz. A teacher who, having been raped by a trusted tutor at fourteen years of age, must face the attacker again as her school’s new headmaster. She refuses to cower before the man, and manages to maintain her dignity and self-respect through two encounters.
The Legend of Sleepy Hollow
Novelette by Washington Irving. A greedy, scheming schoolmaster whose main interest appears to be marrying a girl for her family land disappears after being chased by the "ghost" of a headless horseman. Readers are left to wonder about the horseman’s identity and the schoolmaster’s fate.
The Jay
Short Story by Yasunari Kawabata. A small bird is upset because it can’t find a lost chick that has fallen from its nest. A young woman about to enter into an arranged marriage also feels lost. Her father and stepmother are coming to visit with the mother of her fiancé.
And before I could do anything to prevent it, the shopman had clapped the big drum over him. I saw what was up directly. "Take that off," I cried, "this instant! You'll frighten the boy. Take it off!"
The supposed evidence against her included testimony from witnesses who claimed to have been victims of her spells and the so-called "spectral evidence," which was testimony from alleged victims who claimed to have seen Sarah Good's spirit tormenting them. Sarah Good's trial was plagued with biases, unfair proceedings, and a lack of due process. The court seemed set on convicting her, and they succeeded. She was found guilty of witchcraft and sentenced to death. On July 19, 1692, Sarah Good, along with several others, was executed by hanging. The witchcraft trials in Salem were a dark moment in American history, characterized by mass hysteria, unfounded accusations, and the devastating loss of innocent lives. Sarah Good's case exemplifies the injustice and cruelty that took place during this period. Despite her protests of innocence, Sarah Good was unable to escape the hysteria and paranoia that led to her unjust conviction and tragic demise..
Reviews for "The Legacy of Sarah Good: Examining the Impact of the Witchcraft Trials"
1. John Doe - 1 star
This play was a complete disappointment. The acting was wooden, the dialogue was awkward, and the plot was poorly developed. The portrayal of Sarah Good as a defendant in the witchcraft trials felt shallow and one-dimensional. The whole production lacked substance and failed to captivate the audience. I would not recommend wasting your time or money on this performance.
2. Jane Smith - 2 stars
I had high hopes for "Witchcraft trials with Sarah Good as a defendant," but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The acting was mediocre at best, with many of the performers struggling to deliver their lines convincingly. The storyline felt disjointed and lacked cohesion, making it difficult to follow. The production also suffered from poor pacing, leaving me bored and disengaged throughout. Overall, while it had potential, this play failed to deliver a compelling and coherent narrative.
3. Anthony Thompson - 2.5 stars
While "Witchcraft trials with Sarah Good as a defendant" had some interesting moments, it ultimately failed to impress. The play felt overly long and dragged in several scenes, making it hard to maintain interest. The performances were somewhat lackluster, lacking the emotional depth required to bring the characters to life. Additionally, the set design and costumes were underwhelming, failing to create an immersive experience. This play had potential, but it fell short in execution.
4. Samantha Lewis - 1 star
I found "Witchcraft trials with Sarah Good as a defendant" to be a baffling and poorly thought-out production. The dialogue was cringe-worthy, filled with clichés and predictable lines. The acting was subpar, with exaggerated and over-the-top performances that felt forced. The entire play lacked originality and failed to offer any fresh perspective on the witch trials. I walked away feeling disappointed and unentertained. Overall, I cannot recommend this play to anyone seeking a meaningful or well-executed theatrical experience.
5. Michael Anderson - 2 stars
"Witchcraft trials with Sarah Good as a defendant" had an interesting premise, but it failed to deliver on its potential. The play suffered from weak writing, with dialogue that often felt stilted and unnatural. The performances were hit-and-miss, with some actors shining and others falling flat. The pacing was inconsistent, fluctuating between slow and rushed, which made it challenging to fully invest in the story. While there were moments of promise, this play ultimately left me unsatisfied and wishing for more depth and cohesiveness.