The Curse of Bloody Mary is a popular urban legend and ghost story that has become a part of modern folklore. It revolves around a supernatural entity named Bloody Mary, who is said to appear in mirrors when summoned. According to the legend, those who invoke her presence may suffer from a variety of curses and misfortunes. The origins and details of the Bloody Mary legend vary, but the general premise is consistent. To summon Bloody Mary, one typically stands in front of a mirror in a dimly lit room and recites her name a certain number of times. It is believed that the more times her name is repeated, the stronger the connection and the more likely she is to appear.
Even though we’ve started creating a magic system using these ingredients, it will only become more real as we continue to worldbuild and—most importantly—write.
And creating these runes is a precise, technical skill; if a corner isn t sharp enough or the right intent isn t put into it, the spell will fail, so runesmiths have to go to school to learn their craft. Most authors will find themselves somewhere in the gray area between the two you ll have some established rules to work within, but the reader doesn t know every detail about magic in the grand scheme of things.
It is believed that the more times her name is repeated, the stronger the connection and the more likely she is to appear. It is said that when Bloody Mary is summoned, she may appear in the reflection of the mirror, often appearing as a bloody or disfigured figure. Witnesses claim to have experienced a feeling of dread or fear when encountering her presence.
Book of magic, with instructions for invoking spirits, etc
An eclectic anthology of spells and invocations with charts, magic circles, and descriptions and drawings of spirits, angels, and demons. Draws on the Solomonic tradition, with traces of the Lemegeton (including the Goetia), references to "Friar Bacon" (Roger Bacon), and set within a Christian framework. Multiple spells relate to deterring or catching thieves and curing or preventing sicknesses. Includes translations of Psalms 43, 47, 51, 54, 67, 121, 138, and 150 (p. 25-26)
Notes
General notes
Two portions of a single manuscript acquired separately (in 1958 and 2007) after having been split up no later than 1887. Pages 1-14 remain unlocated Pagination added later in blue ink (contemporary foliation in brown ink survives, foliated 16-114; wanting leaves 15-17, 26-28, 38, 40, 111-113) In English and Latin with some Hebrew Written in black and red ink Annotations in several hands, contemporary and modern, in pencil and ink In the text appears the names: John Weston (p. 143) and in anagrammatic form, John Porter (nh4z retr4p) (p. 135) Dates: May 8, 1577 on p. 51; 1583 on p. 105 Most poems from V.b.26 (1) listed in Folger index of first lines "R.C.S., 1822" (the astrologer R.C. Smith aka Raphael) in manuscript on page 15, after which provenance varies. See item-specific information for each volume (V.b.26 (1)) Also available on microfilm Also available as a digital reproduction
Publications
Mowat, Barbara A. "Prospero's book," Shakespeare Quarterly, Spring 2001, p. 1-33
Exhibited
Exhibited: Shakespeare: The Globe and the World, traveling exhibition, October 4, 1979-September 6, 1982 (V.b.26 (1)) Exhibited: The Curatorial Eye: Discoveries from the Folger Vault, curated by Folger Shakespeare Library staff, Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, D.C., June 13-August 29, 2009
Item information about Folger V.b.26 (2)
p. 206-235, leaves mounted individually (33-34 x 23 cm) and interleaved with modern paper, housed in case (40 x 28 cm); page 218 lower left hand corner damaged and missing 2 of the sigils (1 on p. 218 and 1 on p. 219). Red ink faded. An additional leaf of 20th century notes appears loose after p. 235. Bound in tan calf; blind tooled with title. Housed in brown cloth-covered case. Provenance: R.C. Smith -- Robert Lenkiewicz. Acquired from Sotheby's (London), July 12, 2007 (lot 1). Purchase made possible by the B.H. Breslauer Foundation, Inc
Also known as
Extended title: Book of magic, with instructions for invoking spirits, etc ca. 1577-1583
Alternate titles: Theurgia M.S. 1583 Book of Magic, Key of Solomon
Subjects
Related names
associated with: Bacon, Roger, 1214?-1294
associated with: Meyerstein, Edward Harry William, 1889-1952
former owner: Hockley, Frederick, 1808-1885
former owner: Meyerstein, Edward Harry William, 1889-1952
former owner: Lenkiewicz, R. O. (Robert O.), 1941-2002
former owner: Raphael, 1795-1832
Worse, inventing hundreds of spells that don’t contribute to your story or get used is fun but ultimately shallow. Coming up with a handful of spells that influence your world, are used for character growth, come with consequences, and make your magic system easy to understand are far more powerful for storytelling.
Some even report physical reactions such as scratches, bruises, or fainting spells. The Curse of Bloody Mary is said to befall those who summon her. The specific curses vary, but they typically involve a series of unfortunate events such as accidents, illness, or mental distress. The curses may be temporary or long-lasting, depending on the severity of the summoning and the individual's belief in the legend. The legend of Bloody Mary has been passed down through generations, often told during sleepovers or as a test of bravery. Many people view it as a harmless ghost story, while others genuinely fear the consequences of summoning the spirit. The legend has inspired numerous films, books, and even video games, further perpetuating its popularity. Skeptics argue that the Curse of Bloody Mary is simply a product of superstition and suggest that any negative experiences may be attributed to psychological factors or coincidences. Nevertheless, the legend continues to captivate and intrigue many people, prompting them to test the boundaries of the supernatural. Whether one chooses to believe in the Curse of Bloody Mary or dismiss it as a mere myth, the legend remains a significant part of contemporary folklore. It serves as a reminder of the enduring power of urban legends and the human fascination with the supernatural..
Reviews for "Bloody Mary's Revenge: The Consequences of Summoning Her"
1. Jessica - 2/5 - The Curse of Bloody Mary left me extremely disappointed. The storyline was weak and predictable, with no real surprises or scares. The acting was subpar, with unconvincing performances from the entire cast. The special effects were also lacking, and at times, they were even laughable. Overall, the film failed to deliver any genuine horror or thrills, and I wouldn't recommend wasting your time on it.
2. Mike - 1/5 - I cannot believe I wasted my money on The Curse of Bloody Mary. The film was an absolute disaster from start to finish. The plot was nonsensical and poorly developed, leaving me confused and uninterested. The acting was atrocious, with no convincing performances or emotional depth. Furthermore, the jump scares were poorly executed and felt forced, adding to the overall disappointment. Save yourself the agony and stay far away from this film.
3. Sarah - 2.5/5 - The Curse of Bloody Mary had potential, but it fell short in execution. The storyline had some interesting ideas, but they were poorly developed and lacked cohesion. The acting was mediocre at best, with moments of overacting and lack of chemistry between the characters. The scares were predictable, and the film relied too heavily on jump scares rather than building genuine suspense. I was left feeling underwhelmed and unsatisfied with the overall experience.
4. David - 1/5 - The Curse of Bloody Mary was a complete waste of time. The plot was weak, predictable, and lacked any originality. The acting was incredibly wooden, leaving no emotional connection to the characters or the story. The scares were repetitive and failed to elicit any genuine fear. The film was riddled with cliches and felt like a cheap attempt to cash in on the horror genre. I would highly recommend skipping this film and finding something better to watch.