Once upon a time, in a land far away, there lived a deceitful witch. This witch was known for her cunning and trickery, as she would often disguise herself and manipulate others for her own personal gain. She had a reputation for deceiving innocent villagers and playing with their emotions. The deceitful witch had the power to transform into any form she desired. She would often take on the appearance of a beautiful woman, enchanting the hearts of men with her charms. It was through this facade that she would lure unsuspecting victims into her trap.
Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,091,825 members, 7,620,267 topics. Date: Saturday, 21 October 2023 at 06:34 AM
In anamistic societies as well as amongst the New Agers Stateside, it is universally acknowledged that some people have the gift of seeing hearing experiencing spiritual enteties, while others don t. If the spirit sent to torment Saul was an evil spirit and I have interpreted it as a demeanour disposition till now then it would have had an intimate knowledge of Saul from observation.
It was through this facade that she would lure unsuspecting victims into her trap. Once under her control, the deceitful witch would weave a web of lies and deceit around her victims. She would manipulate their thoughts and emotions, using their weaknesses against them.
1 Samuel 28 - the Witch of Endor- deceitful or successful?
Although I am now in Corinthians, the family Bible studies are a couple of weeks behind me and the kids were studying the Witch of Endor text the same week as Halloween. As I read the the yet again, I realised that Saul saw nothing and did not speak to Samuel. The witch was the voice of Samuel and she gave a verbal description of Samuel. Does this not requires us to have the witch "channeling" Samuel? This I think goes too far and I cannot see it being the real Samuel.
If the spirit sent to torment Saul was an evil spirit (and I have interpreted it as a demeanour/disposition till now)then it would have had an intimate knowledge of Saul from observation. Part of it's taunt was no doubt the loss of the kingdom - that taunt now continues through the Witch of Endor.
Jesus refused to accept testimony from demons and Paul cast out a demon that was effectively acting as his herald. I just cannot see the Witch of Endor as a legitimate way for God to speak. Not that I am saying He could not overrule but it just does not seem consistent - do you agree?
Leslie
Puritan Board Junior
I think the problem that most Western folks have with this passage is their underlying naturalistic, anti-supernatural world views. We just don't see successful channeling in the West, so we think it does not exist. In anamistic societies as well as amongst the New Agers Stateside, it is universally acknowledged that some people have the "gift" of seeing/hearing/experiencing spiritual enteties, while others don't. In the West the majority of people are deaf and blind to these things. In other cultures it is not that way. It also varies with geography, as if there is a cloud hovering over Western society, perhaps because of a Godly history.
When I was in Thailand for a year and socialized with some Australians, a couple of us saw and heard spiritual realities while we were there, but this ceased when we returned to the States/Australia. It happened again on our returns to Bangkok. Other Westerners were as deaf and blind in Bangkok as what they were in the West. So Saul was deaf and blind, as were the guys with him. They were in the majority. The witch was "gifted", whatever that means.
There are other examples in scripture where long-dead people were seen and talked to. That isn't a problem. For me the problem comes in an evil person (the witch) conveying a godly message to Saul. The godly and the demonic seem to be all mixed up in the story. In most of the scriptural history the good and bad are obviously divided. It's black and white. This story as well as the one of the prohet who lied to another are examples of its not always being that way in real life. There is a book, The Beautiful Side of Evil, with the same theme, of "good" things happening as a result of demonic influence. The consequences, however, are evil, namely spiritual entrapment, selling one's soul for a mess of porridge.
I think the problem that most Western folks have with this passage is their underlying naturalistic, anti-supernatural world views. We just don't see successful channeling in the West, so we think it does not exist. In anamistic societies as well as amongst the New Agers Stateside, it is universally acknowledged that some people have the "gift" of seeing/hearing/experiencing spiritual enteties, while others don't. In the West the majority of people are deaf and blind to these things. In other cultures it is not that way. It also varies with geography, as if there is a cloud hovering over Western society, perhaps because of a Godly history.
They became puppets in her hands, oblivious to her true intentions. No one could escape the deceitful witch's grasp. Her powers were too strong, her manipulations too convincing. She reveled in her ability to twist the truth, turning it to her advantage. The village lived in fear of her, knowing that they could never trust what they saw or heard. But there was one person who saw through the deceitful witch's facade. A young boy named Jack had observed her actions from a distance. He noticed the patterns in her manipulation and the way she would dangle hope in front of her victims before snatching it away. Jack decided to confront the deceitful witch, determined to stop her reign of terror. He used his wit and intelligence to outsmart her, refusing to fall for her tricks. Jack exposed her true identity to the villagers, revealing her deceitful nature. The deceitful witch, now exposed and powerless, fled the village in disgrace. The villagers rejoiced, grateful that they were finally free from her manipulations. They learned an important lesson about the dangers of deceit and the power of truth. From then on, the villagers remained vigilant, wary of potential deceit and manipulation. They recognized that trust was a precious commodity that could easily be shattered. They vowed to be honest and transparent in their dealings, hoping to build a community based on trust and integrity. Although the deceitful witch had been defeated, her legacy remained. The villagers would forever remember the cunning and trickery she had brought upon them. But they would also remember the courage and determination of young Jack, who had stood up against evil and fought for truth. In the end, the deceitful witch served as a reminder that appearances can be deceiving. It taught the villagers to be cautious and discerning, to question motives and seek the truth. And most importantly, it reminded them of the power of honesty and the dangers of manipulation..
Reviews for "The Deceitful Witch: Charms and Illusions Explained"
- John - 1/5 - I found "The deceitful witch" to be incredibly dull and predictable. The characters were flat and had no depth, the storyline was unoriginal and lacking any surprises. It felt like the author was simply going through the motions, following a formulaic plot without adding any unique elements. Overall, I was extremely disappointed and would not recommend this book.
- Mary - 2/5 - I had high hopes for "The deceitful witch" based on the synopsis, but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The pacing was inconsistent, with long stretches of boredom followed by rushed and confusing action scenes. The writing style felt forced and pretentious, trying too hard to sound profound but ultimately coming across as cheesy. The ending was especially unsatisfying, leaving many loose ends and unresolved plot points. Sadly, I cannot say I enjoyed this book.
- David - 2/5 - "The deceitful witch" had an intriguing premise, but it failed to deliver on its potential. The characters were poorly developed, and their motivations were unclear and inconsistent. The dialogue felt stilted and unnatural, making it difficult to connect with the story. Additionally, there were numerous plot holes and inconsistencies that further detracted from the overall reading experience. I was left feeling confused and unsatisfied by the end of the book.