In Salem, Massachusetts, one of the most infamous events in American history took place: the Salem witch trials of 1692. During this time, several individuals were accused and convicted of practicing witchcraft. While most people are familiar with the human witches of Salem, there is a lesser-known tale of a cow witch that also captured the attention of the townspeople. The story of the Cow Witch of Salem revolves around a local cow named Daisy, who was believed to possess supernatural powers. According to the townspeople, Daisy had the ability to make the milk she produced turn sour and cause illness in those who consumed it. This led to widespread fear and superstition among the community.
We know following: witches can cast varied sort of magic thanks to special organ. Eda gets cursed by her sister, and the very next day she gets turned into the owl beast and then continues to transform sporadically. We do not know how she managed to change back first time, but we know that in show proper Eda´s curse can be affected by light, laughing, make Eda go back to her senses by Luz´s desperate call and so on. We also know that Eda takes potions to slow the curse process down, and we know that Lilith takes half her curse, which renders Eda´s natural magic useless, Lilith is weakened, and both acquire lesser version of the curse. I ask, how is this possible from biological standpoint? …magic, magical biological standpoint, but I’ll try to keep it close to human biology so I can draw comparisons.
I m a bit anxious tonight and brain won t keep quiet, so let s dive into the biology of witches, how magic works and then focus on Eda s curse via SCIENCE so I can distract myself. The Pura Belpré Award, established in 1996, is presented to a Latino or Latina writer and illustrator whose work best portrays, affirms, and celebrates the Latino cultural experience in an outstanding work of literature for children and youth.
This led to widespread fear and superstition among the community. As word of Daisy's alleged powers spread, a group of townspeople decided to take action. They accused the cow of being a witch and demanded that it be put on trial.
Money Magic: The Long and Short of ALSC Endowments
Most ALSC members and children's librarians are familiar with the words "Arbuthnot," "Belpré," and "Wilder," and the honors corresponding to those names. But do you know how some of these honors, awards, and distinctions are funded? Like many other ALA divisions, ALSC has several long-term investments, previously called endowments. ALSC’s nine endowments include Arbuthnot, Belpré, Carnegie Video, Children’s, Distinguished Service, Rollins, Melcher, William C. Morris, and Wilder. Each long-term investment has its own restrictions, usually designated by the donor, on how the funds should be used. Here’s a closer look at these endowments.
The ALSC Distinguished Service Award endowment was founded in 1986, and the initial donor was the Antonio Mayorgas Estate. This endowment funds the $1,000 award and pin given to the ALSC Distinguished Service Award recipient. ALSC honors an individual member of the association who has made significant contributions to, and an impact on, library services to children and ALSC.
Founded in 2002, the Arbuthnot endowment was created to support the annual Arbuthnot lecture. The recipient of the award, named at the ALA Midwinter Meeting and announced as soon as that person has accepted the appointment, may be an author, critic, librarian, historian, or teacher of children’s literature, of any country, who shall prepare a paper considered to be a significant contribution to the field of children’s literature. Children’s book publisher Scott Foresman established the lecture series in 1969. The Arbuthnot endowment funds the speaker’s $1,000 honorarium, as well as travel and lodging for the speaking engagement.
The Belpré Award endowment was founded in 1997 to fund the medals and citations given to award-winning authors and illustrators. The Pura Belpré Award, established in 1996, is presented to a Latino or Latina writer and illustrator whose work best portrays, affirms, and celebrates the Latino cultural experience in an outstanding work of literature for children and youth. The Belpré award is co-sponsored by ALSC and the National Association to Promote Library and Information Services to Latinos and the Spanish-Speaking (REFORMA), an ALA affiliate. Within the last year, a strong fundraising effort to build the Belpré Award endowment has been spearheaded by ALSC past president Caroline Ward and REFORMA member Carmen Rivera. Many publishers, ALSC members, and REFORMA members continue to support the endowment through donations.
The Carnegie Video endowment was founded in 1989, and the initial donor was the Carnegie Corporation of New York as part of the Carnegie Video for Youth grant. The monies fund the Carnegie Medal, presented annually to an American producer for the most outstanding video production for children released in the United States in the previous calendar year.
The Children’s Library Services endowment, formerly the Helen Knight Memorial Fund, was founded in 1982. The initial donation was at the bequest of Helen L. Knight, to be utilized at ALSC’s discretion. This bequest had no restrictions. At that time, the ALSC Board determined the proceeds would support long and short-range programs of the division. Committee chairs may file an application for funding up to $1,000 in a given year. In 1992, the ALSC Board renamed the fund the "Children’s Library Services Endowment."
Various initial donors founded the Charlemae Rollins Fund in 1982. The income is restricted to the support of ALSC’s annual President’s Program at the ALA Annual Conference. The Frederic G. Melcher Fund, established in 1955, raises funds for scholarships for graduate library students in children’s services. The money funds two $6,000 scholarships for two graduate students intending to pursue an MLS degree and plan to work in children’s librarianship. Every year, the publishers of that year’s Newbery and Caldecott award-winning books donate funds to support the endowment.
The William C. Morris Endowment Fund was established in 2000 and activated in 2003 upon the death of Morris, former vice president and director of library promotions at HarperCollins Children’s Books, ALSC member, friend, and recipient of the first ALSC Distinguished Service Award. Morris remembered ALSC in his will. Several years before his death, he worked with the ALA Development Office to establish the restricted endowment. Morris wanted the money to fund programs, publications, events, or awards in promotion of children’s literature. The ALSC Board will determine how to use the interest income to fund ALSC programs, publications, and events.
To support the Wilder award in perpetuity, the Wilder Award endowment was established in 1999. The Laura Ingalls Wilder Award was first given to its namesake in 1954. The award, a bronze medal, honors an author or illustrator whose books, published in the United States, have made, over a period of years, a substantial and lasting contribution to literature for children. Between 1960 and 1980, the Wilder Award was given every five years. From 1980 to 2001, it was awarded every three years. Beginning in 2001, it has been awarded every two years. The interest income pays for the casting and engraving of the medal.
Occasionally, ALSC transfers operating funds to specific endowments to bolster the long-term investments, per the recommendations of the ALSC Planning and Budget Committee and the approval of the ALSC Board of Directors. ALSC also accepts donations to build the endowments. Members can send a check to ALSC and stipulate to which endowment the contribution is earmarked.
The trial, known as the "Cow Witch Trial," became a spectacle in Salem, drawing large crowds and media attention. During the trial, witnesses came forward to testify against the cow, claiming that it had caused them harm or brought bad luck upon them. Others argued that the accusations were absurd and that a cow could not possibly be a witch. Nevertheless, the court decided to proceed with the trial. In the end, Daisy was found guilty of witchcraft and sentenced to death. The townspeople believed that by executing the Cow Witch of Salem, they would rid themselves of its alleged curse. Daisy was led to a field outside of town, where she was burned at the stake. The story of the Cow Witch of Salem has become a footnote in the larger narrative of the Salem witch trials. While it may seem humorous or absurd in retrospect, it reflects the mass hysteria and paranoia that gripped the community during this dark period in history. It also serves as a reminder of how fear and superstition can contribute to unjust accusations and scapegoating. As we look back on the events of the Salem witch trials, it is important to remember the lessons they teach us about the dangers of unchecked hysteria and the importance of justice. The Cow Witch of Salem, although a lesser-known figure, serves as a symbol of the irrationality that can pervade a society in times of fear and uncertainty..
Reviews for "Salem's Cow Witch: Myth or Legend?"
1. Emily - 2 stars:
I was really excited to read "Cow witch salem ma" as the concept seemed unique and interesting. However, I was quite disappointed with the execution of the story. The plot felt disjointed and unclear, and the characters were one-dimensional and lacked depth. Additionally, I found the writing style to be awkward and stilted, making it difficult to fully immerse myself in the story. Overall, "Cow witch salem ma" didn't live up to my expectations and I wouldn't recommend it.
2. Michael - 1 star:
"Cow witch salem ma" was a confusing and tedious read. The storyline was convoluted and lacked coherence, making it difficult to follow what was happening. The characters were poorly developed and their motives were unclear. The writing style was also quite lackluster, with frequent grammatical errors and awkward sentence structures. I struggled to connect with the narrative and ultimately found the book to be a frustrating and unsatisfying read.
3. Samantha - 2 stars:
I had high hopes for "Cow witch salem ma" but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The pacing of the story was incredibly slow, and it felt like nothing of substance was happening for the majority of the book. The dialogue was also quite weak and unconvincing, making it difficult to connect with the characters. While the concept was intriguing, the execution left a lot to be desired. Overall, I found "Cow witch salem ma" to be a disappointing and forgettable read.