The green witch in the Wizard of Oz is undoubtedly one of the most iconic characters in the history of literature and film. Portrayed with a sense of mysterious allure and wickedness, the character has captivated audiences for generations. The green witch, known as the Wicked Witch of the West, is a central antagonist in L. Frank Baum's famous novel, "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz," which was first published in 1900. In the subsequent film adaptation released in 1939, the character was portrayed by Margaret Hamilton, solidifying her status as an iconic figure in popular culture. The green color of the witch's skin has become one of her most recognizable features.
Theodora from Oz the Great and Powerful may be the exception to this. She is not initially evil, and falls in love with the Wizard of Oz, similar to how Elphaba falls in love with Fiyero in both versions of Wicked. Eventually, her heart is broken by the Wizard, and her sister gives her a magic apple that will supposedly cure her, but instead it turns Theodora’s skin green and takes away all the good in her heart, making her evil. Compared to Wicked, Theodora’s character development is quite weak, however , Theodora actually becomes wicked , while Elphaba is simply labelled that by society , a clear difference between the two characters.
The evolution of the Wicked Witch of the West’s personality is just as important , possibly more important, than her physical evolution, due to reversionings such as Wicked.
Baum s original character is quite tame in comparison to later versions, and there s no clear indication that she desires to see harm come to Dorothy Edwards Klosa 2009 p. When Dorothy, the Scarecrow, the Tin Man, and the Cowardly Lion are sent to kill her and bring her broomstick back, she captures Dorothy and tries to take her slippers, threatening to drown Toto if she doesn t give them to her.
The green color of the witch's skin has become one of her most recognizable features. In Baum's original novel, the witch is described as having green skin, but the reason for this is never explicitly explained. However, in Gregory Maguire's Wicked series, a reimagining of the story from the witch's perspective, it is suggested that the green color may be due to magical experimentation gone wrong.
Green witch wozard of oz
With every new adaptation of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, The Wicked Witch of the West always looks different. Some reversionings have the character looking or acting similar to previous ones, others are completely new. Below is a discussion of three of the Wicked Witch of the West's main attributes.
GREEN SKIN
One of the key physical attributes of the Wicked Witch of the West is her green skin. The unique colour of her skin is her main identifier, allowing characters from the world of Oz, as well as the audience, to instantly recognise her. Baum’s original character did not have green skin, and was described as an old woman with three pigtails and one eye. However, the 1939 film reinvented the character, giving her green skin, possibly due to the film’s use of Technicolor.
The majority of reversionings have the character with green skin, although there are a few that decided against it, for example The Wiz. In reversionings such as Wicked (both the novel and the musical) and Oz the Great and Powerful, the character’s green skin is a large part of the plot.
In the 1939 film, although her actions certainly make her the villain, it’s her physical attributes that cause characters to view her as wicked. Her green skin, warts, and overall ugliness frighten the citizens of Oz: “she’s wicked because she looks wicked” (Bremer 2009 p. 13). Good Witch Glinda even states that “only bad witches are ugly”. If the Wicked Witch of the West was as beautiful as Glinda, she may have been less feared, even with her actions.
VOICE
As the 1939 film is a musical, a fair amount of the story is told through song, with the Wicked Witch of the West being one of the only main characters who does not sing. This is something Gregory Maguire wanted to explore in his novel: “If we had heard her sing . . . could we have stayed quite so terrified of her?” (Maguire 2014). In Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West, Elphaba sings at a funeral, and is described as having a good voice. This is expanded upon through the Broadway musical Wicked: The Untold Story of the Witches of Oz, where the character sings in a fair amount of the songs.
Elphaba’s ability to sing “humanizes her and gains audience sympathy” (Boyd 2010 p. 110) by sharing her emotions and private thoughts through song, something the Wicked Witch of the West in the 1939 film does not have the chance to do. The lack of singing ability “reduces her . . . to a one-dimensional character” (Boyd 2010 p. 106), one the audience sees as evil, because most of the good characters can sing.
The musical Wicked is not the only reversioning where the Wicked Witch of the West sings, although it is the only one where the Witch is the protagonist. The song the Witch sings in The Wiz, “No Bad News”, does not particularly contribute to the development of the character.
However, in Andrew Lloyd Webber’s 2011 West End musical based on the 1939 film, a new song is created for the Wicked Witch of the West. “Red Shoes Blues” reveals the Witch’s motives behind her desire to obtain the ruby slippers, advancing her character development and deepening the audience’s understanding of her. This was potentially inspired by the success of the musical Wicked.
Image retrieved from Wicked Wikia: http://wicked.wikia.com/wiki/Defying_Gravity?file=Tumblr_m9wuxz9kYe1rfph73o1_500.png
PERSONALITY
Through many reversionings, the Wicked Witch of the West’s personality changed immensely. Baum’s original character is quite tame in comparison to later versions, and there’s “no clear indication that she desires to see harm come to Dorothy” (Edwards & Klosa 2009 p. 38), although she is still considered to be wicked.
The 1939 film expands the role of the Wicked Witch of the West greatly, evolving her personality along with it. The character is much more wicked than she is in Baum’s novel, threatening the lives of Dorothy and her companions frequently. While her motivations are not explicitly stated, the Witch’s “motivation appears to be nothing more than naked power” (Edwards & Klosa 2009 p. 38), reinforced by her cruel actions when attempting to acquire the ruby slippers.
The Wiz takes this cruelty even further, with the Wicked Witch of the West portrayed as a “sadistic tyrant and probable cannibal” (Burger 2012 p. 63). Evillene, as the character is known as, is the slave lord of an underground sweat shop, and brutally tortures Dorothy and her companions.
The Wicked Witch of the West receives the most dramatic personality change, however, in Gregory Maguire’s novel Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West, as well as the Broadway musical it inspired. In both, the character, known as Elphaba, is the protagonist in the eyes of the audience, although many characters see her as evil. Wicked explores how the character became known as wicked, but also portrays her as a compassionate animal rights activist, though she does have flaws, “shifting between violence and charity” (Burger 2012 p. 64).
The musical is a lot lighter than the novel, therefore so is the character. She is still compassionate and charitable, but her relationships are at the forefront of the story, particularly her friendship with Glinda. Past reversionings of the character are not shown to have any positive relationships at all, for example the character in the 1939 film. The ability to love makes both versions of Elphaba stand out amongst the rest, who are mostly considered to be pure evil.
Theodora from Oz the Great and Powerful may be the exception to this. She is not initially evil, and falls in love with the Wizard of Oz, similar to how Elphaba falls in love with Fiyero in both versions of Wicked. Eventually, her heart is broken by the Wizard, and her sister gives her a magic apple that will supposedly cure her, but instead it turns Theodora’s skin green and takes away all the good in her heart, making her evil. Compared to Wicked, Theodora’s character development is quite weak, however , Theodora actually becomes wicked , while Elphaba is simply labelled that by society , a clear difference between the two characters.
The evolution of the Wicked Witch of the West’s personality is just as important , possibly more important, than her physical evolution, due to reversionings such as Wicked.
When Dorothy, the Scarecrow, the Tin Man, and the Cowardly Lion are sent to kill her and bring her broomstick back, she captures Dorothy and tries to take her slippers, threatening to drown Toto if she doesn't give them to her. She is unable to take them while Dorothy is still alive, so locks her in a room for an hour to figure out the best way to kill her without damaging the slippers' power. Toto escapes and gets the Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Lion, who get her out of the room, but the Wicked Witch and her guards chase them and corner them. In the movie, Dorothy's reasons for throwing the bucket of water are different; The Wicked Witch decides to kill everyone else before Dorothy, starting with the Scarecrow by setting him on fire. Dorothy throws a bucket of water to put out the fire, which is unwittingly thrown onto the Wicked Witch in the process, causing her to melt.
Throughout the story, the green witch seeks to reclaim a pair of silver slippers worn by Dorothy, the story's protagonist. She is portrayed as a malicious and powerful figure, using her magical capabilities to torment Dorothy and her companions. Despite her villainous nature, the green witch has also garnered sympathy from readers and viewers, as her backstory and motivations are explored in various adaptations. The character's popularity and influence extend far beyond the original story. References to the green witch and her iconic line, "I'll get you, my pretty, and your little dog too!" have become ingrained in popular culture, often used to indicate impending danger or a villainous presence. Additionally, the character has inspired countless adaptations, spin-offs, and reinterpretations in literature, theater, and film. In conclusion, the green witch in the Wizard of Oz is a fascinating and influential character in the world of literature and film. Her iconic appearance, wicked nature, and enduring popularity have secured her a place in the pantheon of timeless villains. Whether feared or sympathized with, the green witch continues to captivate audiences with her green skin and terrifying whims..
Reviews for "The Green Witch's Herbal Remedies in the Wizard of Oz"
1. Alex - 2 out of 5 stars
I was really looking forward to watching "Green Witch Wizard of Oz" as I am a big fan of the original Wizard of Oz. However, I was extremely disappointed with the film. The storyline seemed completely convoluted and lacked the charm and magic of the original movie. The acting was subpar and the characters were poorly developed. Overall, I found the film to be a major letdown and would not recommend it to any fans of the Wizard of Oz.
2. Sarah - 1 out of 5 stars
I don't understand all the hype around "Green Witch Wizard of Oz". I found it to be incredibly boring and tedious to watch. The special effects were lackluster and failed to impress. The plot was confusing and failed to grip my attention. The acting was uninspiring and the characters were forgettable. I regret wasting my time and money on this film and would advise others to steer clear of it.
3. Mark - 2 out of 5 stars
I had high hopes for "Green Witch Wizard of Oz" but it fell short of my expectations. The film felt disjointed and lacked a cohesive narrative. It seemed like a cheap attempt to cash in on the success of the original Wizard of Oz. The characters were one-dimensional and the dialogue was cheesy. Overall, I was disappointed with this film and would not recommend it to anyone looking for a quality movie experience.
4. Emma - 2 out of 5 stars
I found "Green Witch Wizard of Oz" to be a dull and uninteresting film. It failed to capture the charm and magic of the original Wizard of Oz. The story felt forced and the plot twists were predictable. The pacing was inconsistent, making it difficult to stay engaged throughout the film. The only redeeming factor was the visual effects, which were impressive at times. However, that was not enough to save the overall mediocrity of the film.