"The Year of Magical Thinking" is a memoir written by Joan Didion, published in 2005. The book revolves around the year following the sudden death of Didion's husband, writer John Gregory Dunne. The memoir documents Didion's grief and her attempts to make sense of the tragedy. The central theme of the book is the profound impact of loss and the disorienting experience of grief. Didion explores the complexity of emotions that accompany the death of a loved one and the ways in which it can fundamentally alter one's perception of reality. She reflects on her own expectations and assumptions about death, and how her husband's sudden passing challenged those beliefs.
Death haunts a writer in American Players Theatre's 'Year of Magical Thinking'
By Mike Fischer, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, July 2, 2014.
American Players Theatre s Sarah Day makes Didion s devastating Year magical By Kevin Lynch, Culture Currents Vernaculars Speak blog, originally published in The Shepherd Express, July 3, 2014. This is what she means by magical thinking the primitive belief that if you take a certain course of action, the desired consequence will inevitably follow.
She reflects on her own expectations and assumptions about death, and how her husband's sudden passing challenged those beliefs. The title of the book, "The Year of Magical Thinking," refers to Didion's tendency to engage in irrational thoughts and behavior as a way of coping with her grief. She describes moments of magical thinking, where she convinces herself that her husband is still alive or that she can somehow bring him back.
The Year of Magical Thinking
S ome shows are impervious to criticism. And only the stoniest heart could not respond in some measure to Joan Didion's play, based on her memoir, about the death of her husband and their daughter. But, for all the brilliance of Vanessa Redgrave's performance and the sensitivity of David Hare's production, I was less emotionally pulverised than I had expected.
I put this down to the venue. Having played the 767-seat Booth Theatre in New York, Didion's work is now at the Lyttelton, which is an inhospitable space for a one-woman show. The play depends upon an intimate bond between actor and audience hard to achieve in this rigidly geometrical theatre. Admittedly Bob Crowley's gradually unfolding backdrops of misty marine vistas look supremely impressive. But even an artist as skilled as Redgrave finds it difficult to converse with a two-tiered audience in a quasi-cinematic space.
A pity, since the content is so powerful.
What it reveals, above all, is the dislocating madness of grief. Didion, clearly a woman of implacable intelligence, finds it impossible to come to terms with the death of her husband, scriptwriter John Gregory Dunne, in December 2003.
Even as a friend informs the New York Times of his death, Didion wonders if he could still be alive in the different time zone of Los Angeles. And, when she bundles his clothes into bags, she hangs onto his shoes against his possible return. This is what she means by "magical thinking": the primitive belief that if you take a certain course of action, the desired consequence will inevitably follow.
Didion also brings her priceless reportorial gifts to bear on the subject of the death of her daughter, Quintana, 18 months later, from pancreatitis.
Didion scrupulously observes her own behaviour during her daughter's prolonged hospitalisation in Los Angeles, even avoiding any venue that could stir painful memories. Yet she emerges from this irrationality into a fierce sanity that leads her to conclude "there comes a time when we must relinquish the dead".
Redgrave brings to all this her own unique emotional transparency. She inhabits the very soul of the character, and lets you see Didion's honesty, guilt, irony, and capacity for self-examination.
The rare moments of naked suffering, as when she cries "Why didn't he come back?", also acquire a visceral power. It is a consummate piece of acting, reinforced by Hare's austerely beautiful production in which effects, such as a distant sound of funeral bells, are kept to a refined minimum. But, although the evening is undeniably impressive, it rarely for me became a fully shared emotional experience.
· Until July 15. Box Office: 020 7452 3000.
“Extraordinary. Didion’s eloquent contribution to the exploration of loss. a 'must-see' event.” – DC Metro Arts
Didion questions the line between rationality and irrationality, examining the ways in which grief can distort one's thinking and alter one's grasp on reality. Throughout the memoir, Didion explores the intersection of personal grief and collective grief. She reflects on the deaths of others, such as her daughter's severe illness and the loss of close friends. This broader perspective serves to emphasize the universality of grief and the ways in which loss resonates within a larger community. "The Year of Magical Thinking" is a raw and poignant exploration of grief and its aftermath. Didion's writing style is intimate and deeply reflective, allowing readers to delve into her emotional journey. The memoir offers a profound meditation on the nature of loss, providing insight into the complexities of mourning and the potential for healing..
Reviews for "The Influence of "The Year of Magical Thinking" in Contemporary Literature"
1. John - 2/5 - I had high hopes for "The Year of Magical Thinking" as I had heard great things about it. However, I found the play to be slow-paced and lacking in depth. The storyline felt disjointed and the characters were difficult to connect with. Overall, I was disappointed with this production and would not recommend it to others.
2. Sarah - 1/5 - "The Year of Magical Thinking" left me feeling confused and frustrated. The play never seemed to find its footing, and the constant jumping between past and present was confusing and disjointed. While the theme of grief and loss is important, it was not effectively portrayed in this production. I was left feeling unsatisfied and unsure of what the play was trying to convey.
3. Michael - 2/5 - I found "The Year of Magical Thinking" to be overly pretentious and self-indulgent. The constant monologues and introspective musings became tiresome after a while. The play lacked a clear narrative and failed to engage me emotionally. I found myself disinterested and counting down the minutes until it would end. Overall, I was disappointed with this production and would not recommend it to others.
4. Emily - 3/5 - While I wouldn't say I disliked "The Year of Magical Thinking," it didn't leave a lasting impact on me. The play felt somewhat repetitive, with the main character often rehashing the same thoughts and memories. I was expecting a more gripping and emotionally charged performance, but instead, I felt detached from the story. Although the acting was commendable, the overall execution of the play fell short for me.