Exploring the Role of Patronymics in the Salem Witch Trials

During the infamous Salem witch trials of 1692-1693, more than 200 people were accused of practicing witchcraft. Among the accused were several women whose names have come to be associated with the trials, such as Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Bridget Bishop. Interestingly, many of the accused witches were referred to by their patronymics, which were derived from their father's first names. This practice was common during the time period and served to identify a person's lineage and social standing. For example, Mary Esty, one of the accused witches, was commonly referred to as "Mary the daughter of Isaac Esty." This patronymic is composed of her father's first name, Isaac, and his family name, Esty.

" This patronymic is composed of her father's first name, Isaac, and his family name, Esty. It was common for people to be known by their patronymics, which served as a form of identification in the community. In the case of the Salem witch trials, the use of patronymics may have been a way to further stigmatize and demonize the accused witches.

M8ball.com valuation and analysis

M8ball.com has global traffic rank of 1,337,252. M8ball.com has an estimated worth of US$ 255,872, based on its estimated Ads revenue. M8ball.com receives approximately 2,336 unique visitors each day. Its web server is located in Germany, with IP address 138.201.82.130. According to SiteAdvisor, m8ball.com is safe to visit.

Traffic & Worth Estimates

Traffic Ranks

DNS Records

HTTP Headers

HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:08:36 GMT Server: Apache Location: https://m8ball.com/ Content-Length: 227 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:08:37 GMT Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0 Content-Language: en Pragma: no-cache Expires: 0 Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 X-Powered-By: ASP.NET X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727 Accept-Ranges: none Set-Cookie: ce=1; expires=Wed, 23-Jun-2021 08:08:37 GMT; Max-Age=31536000; path=/ Set-Cookie: fc=1; expires=Wed, 23-Jun-2021 08:08:37 GMT; Max-Age=31536000; path=/ Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=raq854cg69u3elpcelfh15ckeu; expires=Mon, 21-Sep-2020 08:08:37 GMT; Max-Age=7776000; path=/ Set-Cookie: auix=0AA1F343CA102669; expires=Mon, 17-Nov-2036 00:38:00 GMT; Max-Age=517595363; path=/; domain=m8ball.com Set-Cookie: aui=deleted; expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:01 GMT; Max-Age=0; path=/; domain=m8ball.com Set-Cookie: hc=1518952; expires=Mon, 17-Nov-2036 00:38:00 GMT; Max-Age=517595363; path=/; domain=m8ball.com Last-Modified: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:08:37 GMT Vary: Accept-Encoding Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

M8ball.com Whois Information

Domain Name: M8BALL.COM Registry Domain ID: 1596834315_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.PublicDomainRegistry.com Registrar URL: http://www.publicdomainregistry.com Updated Date: 2019-09-13T08:07:16Z Creation Date: 2010-05-11T19:45:22Z Registry Expiry Date: 2021-05-11T19:45:22Z Registrar: PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com Registrar IANA ID: 303 Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected] Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2013775952 Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited Name Server: NS1.M8BALL.COM Name Server: NS3.M8BALL.COM DNSSEC: unsigned URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/ Domain Name: M8BALL.COM Registry Domain ID: 1596834315_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.publicdomainregistry.com Registrar URL: www.publicdomainregistry.com Updated Date: 2019-12-30T11:30:34Z Creation Date: 2010-05-11T19:45:22Z Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2021-05-11T19:45:22Z Registrar: PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com Registrar IANA ID: 303 Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited Registry Registrant ID: GDPR Masked Registrant Name: GDPR Masked Registrant Organization: GDPR Masked Registrant Street: GDPR Masked Registrant City: GDPR Masked Registrant State/Province: Pleven Registrant Postal Code: GDPR Masked Registrant Country: BG Registrant Phone: GDPR Masked Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: GDPR Masked Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: [email protected] Registry Admin ID: GDPR Masked Admin Name: GDPR Masked Admin Organization: GDPR Masked Admin Street: GDPR Masked Admin City: GDPR Masked Admin State/Province: GDPR Masked Admin Postal Code: GDPR Masked Admin Country: GDPR Masked Admin Phone: GDPR Masked Admin Phone Ext: Admin Fax: GDPR Masked Admin Fax Ext: Admin Email: [email protected] Registry Tech ID: GDPR Masked Tech Name: GDPR Masked Tech Organization: GDPR Masked Tech Street: GDPR Masked Tech City: GDPR Masked Tech State/Province: GDPR Masked Tech Postal Code: GDPR Masked Tech Country: GDPR Masked Tech Phone: GDPR Masked Tech Phone Ext: Tech Fax: GDPR Masked Tech Fax Ext: Tech Email: [email protected] Name Server: ns1.m8ball.com Name Server: ns3.m8ball.com DNSSEC: Unsigned Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected] Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2013775952 URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/ Registration Service Provided By: NICKSOFT SOLUTIONS

Copyright © 2019 SiteIndices

Traffic & Worth Estimates

By referring to the accused women by their father's names, it implied that they were the products of their father's actions and therefore inherited their alleged witchcraft. This further reinforced the idea that witchcraft was a hereditary trait and justified the persecution and execution of these individuals. In addition to Mary Esty, other accused witches who were identified by their patronymics include Elizabeth Proctor (wife of John Proctor), Rebecca Nurse (wife of Francis Nurse), and Martha Corey (wife of Giles Corey). The use of patronymics in these cases served to diminish the individuality and agency of the accused women, reducing them to mere extensions of their fathers and husbands. Overall, the use of patronymics in the Salem witch trials highlights the power dynamics and social structures of the time. It also demonstrates how language and naming practices can be used to reinforce existing prejudices and justify acts of persecution..

Reviews for "Unraveling the Stories Behind the Patronymics of Accused Witches in Salem"

1. John Doe - 1 star

I found "Patronymics of alleged witches in the Salem witch hunts" to be extremely disappointing. The book lacked depth and failed to provide any new or interesting insights into the event. The author simply listed the names of alleged witches and their patronymics without any analysis or context. There was no attempt to explore the social and cultural factors that led to the witch hunts or to shed light on the experiences of the women involved. Overall, I felt like I wasted my time reading this book and would not recommend it to anyone.

2. Jane Smith - 2 stars

While I appreciate the effort of the author to shed light on the patronymics of alleged witches in the Salem witch hunts, I was left feeling underwhelmed by the book. The information presented was repetitive and lacked depth. The author failed to provide sufficient historical context or analysis to make the topic engaging and insightful. Additionally, the writing style was dry and tedious, making it hard to stay engaged throughout the book. Overall, I felt like this was a missed opportunity to explore a fascinating aspect of the Salem witch trials and I would not recommend it to others.

3. Samantha Brown - 2 stars

"Patronymics of alleged witches in the Salem witch hunts" was not what I expected. The book lacked focus and failed to provide a clear thesis or argument. The author seemed to be more interested in listing names and familial connections without providing any meaningful analysis. As a result, I found it difficult to stay engaged with the book and struggled to find any value in the information presented. I was disappointed by the lack of depth and would not recommend this book to others interested in the Salem witch trials.

Patronymics and the Stigmatization of Women in the Salem Witch Trials