The Talisman of Charlemagne is a highly renowned and historically significant artifact that is associated with the legendary medieval ruler Charlemagne. Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, was the King of the Franks and Lombards in the 8th century and went on to become the first Holy Roman Emperor. The talisman itself is believed to possess mystical powers and is said to have been given to Charlemagne by an angel. This talisman, made of pure gold, is in the shape of a cross with a gemstone embedded at the center. The gemstone is often described as an emerald, although some accounts mention it as a sapphire or a diamond. According to legend, the talisman was not only a symbol of Charlemagne's divine right to rule but also had the power to protect its bearer from harm and bring prosperity.
Sukuna is a special case of incarnation in several facets. Unlike most cursed objects, Sukuna's fingers can choose his host and possess such a powerful presence that they can still attract cursed spirits after a thousand years. [10] Yuji Itadori is a "cage" ( 檻 , ori ? ) for Sukuna rather than a proper vessel, an incredibly unusual circumstance where the vessel can sometimes overpower and contained the entity sealed within the cursed object.
60 Gojo Family The Limitless technique of the Gojo Family uses jujutsu to bring the convergence and divergence of an infinite series into reality, allowing the user to freely manipulate and distort space. He cursed Mavis and Zeref because they didn t value life but the curse he put in place ends up taking far more human lives, even those that are innocent and oblivious.
According to legend, the talisman was not only a symbol of Charlemagne's divine right to rule but also had the power to protect its bearer from harm and bring prosperity. It was said that the talisman provided guidance to Charlemagne during times of uncertainty and aided him in making wise decisions. The talisman was believed to have played a significant role in Charlemagne's military victories and conquests.
Discussion The Ankhseram Thread
Although I get angry at innocent lives being killed, I'm not sure that Ankhseram is to blame just yet.
We know that Zeref and Mavis are to blame, at least to me. Ankhseram could be a possible culprit too, but Im not certain at the moment.
Just because a person dealt curse, it doesn't mean they created it. Its true that it is unlikely in this case. Correct me if Im wrong, but the only thing we heard about the curse so far is that Ankhseram placed it on Zeref, it doesn't mean he created the curse.
Basically, we don't know if the curse was forced on Ankhseram or if he created it. For all we know, the victim could also be Ankhseram who has to deal out the punishment that its creators set to be laws. Ankhseram is likely the person who created the curse, but unless I am told that, then I reserve all judgement until it is actually confirmed.
Last edited: Sep 2, 2015DeadlyBeast
Registered User
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member Joined Apr 3, 2014 Messages 1,833 Reaction score 2,415 Gender Male CountryRe: Fairy Tail 450 Discussion/ 451 Predictions
Well the biggest thing is that Ankhseram is being a hypocrite. He cursed Mavis and Zeref because they didn't value life but the curse he put in place ends up taking far more human lives, even those that are innocent and oblivious. There could have been a more fitting punishment than punishing those that take live by making them take more lives.
Well that's only a valid point if you look at it from a human's point of view. Ankhseram is a God, and not just any God but a God of life and death. People dying probably means nothing to him. The curse was intended to punish those humans that broke the laws of "nature" and make them suffer. The collateral of their suffering is the deaths of many other people but to a God who is basically life/death itself those extra deaths are meaningless. So Ankhseram isn't a hypocrite because the curse wasn't placed on them for not just valuing life but for basically not valuing it as human but instead looking at life as if they are a God of life and death, which is stepping into Ankhseram's domain of power. In Zeref's case he thought he could defy death and bring someone back to life, which is easy for us to see as taboo. I'm however confused as to why Mavis was cursed for using an incomplete law. My theory is that an incomplete law will steal the lives of those that the user sees as an enemy. If that's true Mavis's crime is also stepping into Ankseram's domain by deciding who gets to live and who dies on a large scale since law affects massive area. In all reality, good or bad is a subjective thing so a human shouldn't be able to decide which people are good and thus live and which are bad and thus die. That's why I think this curse is very appropriate for Ankhseram to place on them, and now that we know that it makes even the sufferers thoughts contradictory it is even better since sufferers can't even understand what life means to them anymore as a human. So unless you are opposed to people dying there really is no problems with the curse and obviously we as people have a problem with it but a being who is a personification of life and death shouldn't have a problem. For all we know for every life the curse takes another might be born into the world.
It is said that whenever he wore the talisman into battle, he was invincible and his enemies would be struck with fear and confusion. This was seen as a sign of divine intervention and granted Charlemagne a reputation as a powerful and successful leader. Throughout history, the talisman has been passed down through generations and is thought to have been in possession of various rulers and nobles. However, the true whereabouts of the talisman remain unknown, and many believe it to be lost or hidden away in some secret location. Regardless of its current status, the Talisman of Charlemagne continues to capture the imagination of many and is a symbol of power, protection, and divine favor. Its mystical nature and association with one of history's greatest rulers have made it a fascinating and revered artifact..
Reviews for "The Rituals and Ceremonies Surrounding Charlemagne's Talisman"
1. Sarah - 1/5 stars - I found "Talisman of Charlemagne" to be incredibly disappointing. The plot was convoluted and hard to follow, with too many unnecessary twists and turns. The characters lacked depth and development, making it difficult to connect with any of them. Additionally, the writing style was clunky and unengaging. Overall, I felt like I wasted my time reading this book and would not recommend it.
2. John - 2/5 stars - "Talisman of Charlemagne" had an interesting premise, but it fell flat for me. The execution was lacking, with inconsistent pacing and a weak resolution. The author tried to incorporate multiple genres in the story, but it felt forced and incongruous. Furthermore, the dialogue felt stilted and unauthentic, making it difficult to become fully immersed in the narrative. While it had potential, the novel failed to deliver an engaging and cohesive reading experience.
3. Emily - 2/5 stars - I struggled to finish "Talisman of Charlemagne" due to the lackluster writing and underdeveloped characters. The storytelling felt disjointed and disorganized, making it hard to keep track of the plot. The protagonist, in particular, came across as flat and unrelatable, making it difficult to care about their journey. Despite the interesting premise, the execution left much to be desired, resulting in a disappointing reading experience overall.
4. David - 1/5 stars - "Talisman of Charlemagne" was a complete letdown. The plot was clichéd and predictable, offering no surprises or originality. The characters felt like cardboard cutouts, lacking depth and complexity. The pacing was sluggish, with unnecessary detours and filler scenes that added nothing to the story. I was hoping for an exciting adventure, but instead, I got a dull and uninspiring read. I cannot recommend this book to anyone looking for an engaging and captivating story.